It sounded like you were saying America has been a center left country for 24 years. In 92 Clinton got 42% of the vote. If you're saying we were a center left county in 92 you have to be counting Ross Perot's 20% with Clinton. Which most agree Perot pulled votes from Bush, not Clinton.
A year ago her people were saying there was absolutely nothing to this; zero, zilch, nada!!! Now the talking points have evolved to 'not enough to be indicted". Which is no surprise because that's where the Clintons always land in these now very common adventures. They push the envelope just to the point where they can lie and deny their way out. Unless of course, they leave genetic material on a blue dress. How Presidential. I think some of Bernie's ideas are wack, but I'll give him this. I think he has integrity in that he can't be bought. Clinton on the other hand whored out to Wall Street long ago.
I am saying we are a center left country today. I would agree that we were not in 1992, though I would say that probably is where the transition started.
I agree with this. I've said all along that what she has done is shady and very politically inconvenient but not illegal. There is plenty of room for criticism in how she handled this, but she will not be indicted because she hasn't committed a crime.
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/n...z__Hillary_didn_t_try_to_be_emailevolent.html And here we go, the president will use his influence to prevent any indictment.
Under the laws in question, negligence is in fact illegal as she signed FBI training documents on this very subject in 2009. I mean, the president basically confirmed she was negligent. Not sure why he even responded. More to the point both are idiots.
