I don't care about your opinions, I care about what you can prove. No, I said that I'm not going to jump through hoops researching for you if you aren't willing to find the same information for a republican of my choice. Do your own research. I provided one example to shut up Shane. He said she did nothing which is absurd and unprovable.
Not an opinion but facts supplied by the IG of State in numerous reports cited in the article. You got nothing to refute it with so you try to change the subject. Bull shit evasion I pointed out it was a meaningless claim. The bill would have passed if Hitler or Stalin were in her place. Additional BS by trying to change the argument Red. This whole thread is about HRC. If you want to ask that question start a new thread about the Republican candidates Podnah.
Then ask a specific question and I will address it. Shane said that she did nothing at all and I refuted it. That is how it works. What exactly are you asking? You can't command me to just go out and justify Hillary's candidacy to you when you aren't willing to do the same for comparison. It's a subjective subject and without comparison, pointless to argue. Hillary is not my candidate, at least not yet. I'm just refuting unsubstantiated claims about her because it is easy.
@red55 buddy all I did was trash your statement that the $21 billion funding for the WTC was a signal accomplishment of HRC's senate term. You're trying to make it more than that.
@red55 HRC DID NOT have her name on the $21 billion for the WTC. Here is the info from Politifact. In fact the 3 bills she does have her name on are pretty pedestrian. http://www.politifact.com/florida/s...llary-clinton-have-her-name-only-three-laws-/
