Hillary's E-Mail (Breaking News: Smoking Gun Officially Announced)

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Mar 12, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Your hate has consumed you.

    Sorry I'm geeking this morning because I've been watching Star Wars.
     
  2. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Your intelligence is too easily insulted. You seem to take comments by TV talking heads as evidence of something. You also need to understand the difference between classified and sensitive.

    Who the hell is John Heilman and what exactly did he say? What is his evidence, if any? I googled "Heilman Petraeus email" and got nothing whatsoever.

    The big difference between Petraeus and Clinton is that Petraeus plead guilty to knowingly giving "code word" classified documents to his girlfriend and let her keep them in her house when he had no authorization to even take them to his own house. Hillary is not even under criminal investigation.

    Between in or about August 2011 and on or about April 5, 2013, defendant DAVID HOWELL PETRAEUS, being an employee of the United States, and by virtue of his employment, became possessed of documents and materials containing classified information of the United States, and did unlawfully and knowingly remove such documents and materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents and materials at unauthorized locations, aware that these locations were unauthorized for the storage and retention of such classified documents and materials;
    Hillary never released any classified documents to anybody and never caused a breach in security. No one has accused her of unlawfully and knowingly removing documents and materials without authority. Classified documents were handled on .gov servers. Her emails were not classified. Anybody who understand the vast number of letters and emails that exist in government knows that if they were all classified secret no business could be conducted. Some of the information is being redacted now that the emails are being released through FOI, which is standard operating procedure. But they were not classified as secret and the SoS sent and received emails perfectly legally.

    Things that are sensitive will be redacted from emails released under FOIA. That does not make them so sensitive that Hillary couldn't send or receive them from government officials. Business has to be conducted. Remember Hillary never released any of these emails as Secretary of State. They are being released now by the State Department and the redactions do not mean that they were classified at all.
     
  3. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Same old rant with no evidence or even a logical argument. It's the same with all the half-baked accusations and why they are unlikely to amount to anything criminal.

    Don't hold your breath. People have to commit a crime before they go to jail.
     
  4. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,795
    Likes Received:
    23,951
    Dave Petraeus says hello
     
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Hillary says come have breakfast in the white house.
     
  6. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,795
    Likes Received:
    23,951
    Not going to happen
     
  7. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    Do they do it like in the governor's mansion where convicts are the servants? Tell Hilldebeast I like my bacon crispy and my orange juice fresh sqeezed with just a little pulp.
     
  8. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    If you don't know who he is then you show your ignorance. It seems you're Edgar to do research when it suits you. Google him and you'll learn something. Here is his Wiki page. Why don't you read it and educate yourself. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heilemann

    You make all these claims about what HRC did and knew. Where did you get your information? How do you know they are facts? You're just taking her and her supporters spin and treating it as fact. BS buddy show the same support as you demand of us. show me something that isn't spin sport (I like the alliteration).

    Are you so credulous that you believe every word that comes from her mouth? Do you actually believe she is competent to be president? She was handed the senate seat in NY, failed miserably running in 2008 and seems to be doing so again this time. Mrs Clinton has done less with more help and position and her inability to run a campaign is adds to her poor record.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  9. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    are we really talking about being competent enough to be president? I'm sorry but have you seen the circus sideshow rolled out on the right? I wouldn't trust any of them with tying my shoes except maybe 2 of them and those 2 don't have a chance.
     
  10. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536

    focus on your lefties. quit trying to distract from the real issue. hillredbeast.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page