I am sick of this "we should accept them for who they are" crap. Excuses, excuses, excuses! They have an excuse for everything: "I sc***ed a goat, I couldn't help it, it's just who I am. It didn't hurt anybody and the goat actually liked it".
People on the left also use this one for grass smokers. Ahh, come on, it doesn't hurt anyone. Does being a homo hurt anyone? No, I don't guess. But, that is not what I am basing the comparison on. They are all sexual perversions. That is the common thread. Not the fact that one is victimless and the others hurt another person.
People on the right use it, too. And it's true. There should be no laws against anything that doesn't harm anyone else. Anything else is too much government involvement in my personal life. I don't need them to save me from myself. If I choose to do something that harms me, who cares? And by harm I mean in terms of physicality or property. So what if they're all sexual perversions? Big deal. Yeah, I think it's disgusting, but so? What makes it 'acceptable' in a civilized society is that it harms no one. While sexual perversion may be the common thread, what separates them is the fact that homosexuality doesn't harm anyone. Child molesters make a decision to do something that they know is going to harm someone else. Same thing with rapists. I won't excuse beastiality because I believe that is cruelty to animals. But homo's hurt no one, so to classify them with harmful sexual predators is just redneck ignorance.
First of all, they were both homo's before they did each other. Secondly, you might be well-served to explore the definition of 'involuntary.'
Are there any involuntary victims in the circumstance of that man sc*****g the goat. The man and the goat had one hell of a time!:grin:
