More Gross & Disgusting News: Michelle Rodriguez Ate A Mouse Cooked In Her Own Urine In today's weird news, Michelle Rodriguez ate a mouse cooked in her own pee. And no, that is not an exaggeration. The "Fast and the Furious" actress ate the disgusting meal (if you can even call it that) on an episode of NBC's "Running Wild with Bear Grylls." Rodriguez and Grylls were hiking across the Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada when they ran out of food and water, leaving them to feast on whatever they could find/had on in them: a mouse and urine. In the clip, Rodriguez goes behind a rock to fill a container with urine and then brings it back to Grylls so he can boil the mouse (which he caught himself, obviously) in it. And then comes the moment of truth: they eat the stewed rodent. (If you have a weak stomach, we suggest you don't watch.) Instead of explaining how it all goes down in gross detail, we'll just leave this video right here for you. Don't say we didn't warn you http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...id=txtlnkusaolp00000592&kvcommref=mostpopular
Bear Grylls is the worst "expert" on survival on TV. He is notorious for staging phony survival episodes and recommending really stupid things that will get people killed. On his episode in the mountains with jake gyllenhaal, they came upon steel cable stretched across a 100-foot deep canyon, so they crawled on it to cross the canyon. Any fool knows that you don't take stupid chances of getting hurt when you are out there alone with no help. His survival episode in the Atchafalaya basin was laughable. Were talking about a place where 12-year-olds can catch catfish and crawfish with homemade rigs in quantity and really easy. Tiga probably did it when he was 7. What did "Bear" do? Leapt on a 5-foot alligator with a sheath knife like Tarzan. He's going to get people killed.
I saw this picture and this thread was the only place I figured it belonged.... Cate Blanchett went to a premier last night in a white pantsuit. Here's one interesting angle. What I can't figure out is every single pic I've looked at elsewhere, there is no stain. So what the hell? Did she piss this photographer off or did the other photographers photoshop it out?
Photoshop maybe but more likely some weird reflection of spotlights/shadows on that shiny satin from that bright red carpet that is conveniently cropped out of the photo above. No celebrities handlers would allow her go out in public unaware of something like that.
I just don't buy that. The red carpet is not the color of, um....you know. That stain on her pants is too accurate. And the red is not just on the satin, it's on the lace and that doesn't reflect light or color to that extent. A handler might not have noticed as the jacket is nearly long enough to cover it and one doesn't walk with hands in pockets like that....she was posing. And what if she's one of those whack jobs who are trying to prove some feminist point about not using feminine products?
