It's both if you will be honest about it instead of ideological. The politics of global warming is all screwed up. I don't agree with much of what is tossed around from either extreme, although there is a good solid middle on this issue. But the science of global warming is quite sound, has withstood challenge, and I will defend it against a scientific challenge. Instead you offer political rhetoric.
You mean those guys that got busted cooking the books to make it look like it was real..... thats what you are talking about right amigo?:yelwink2:
This is in no way accurate. Attacking the science is not the way to win the global warming debate. Attacking the economics is. The science doesn't even matter.