which is why you didnt answer the question. "This is a complex calculation dependent on much data we cannot know" - red thats what i just said.
Try to pay better attention. I answered the question with a caveat. Just because we don't know everything doesn't mean that we don't know anything.
Just because you cannot doesn't mean that everyone cannot. If you have a case to make, then make it. But you can't just wave your arms and say no one knows anything.
It hasn't been proven one way or another. If you have proof, offer it... Who said no one knows anything? How did you know my arms are waving? Prove it with out a doubt... THEY CAN'T, it's impossible.. with todays current technology and knowledge...
I have offered it in over a dozen threads on this topic in FSA. Go read those and challenge me on anything you like. I'm not repeating myself for yet another skeptic who has not offered a single piece of evidence to support his wild claim. You are quite wrong. There is decades of research and conclusions in the scientific literature. Go read the IPCC report and learn something.
There is a theory that you speak of and cite, but no proof if 100% absolute.. Climate has changed befor humans and will change after...
Gravity is a theory that is not 100% known and absolute. Nevertheless, the preponderance of evidence is reliable that gravity exists and it works. Irrelevant to the issue of human-cause warming. Is that all you got?
So we are trying to prove, exuse me, justify, that an event that is on record before humans is now cause by humans?
