Yes ..... try this one instead. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf The committee found no evidence that the campaign members were aware of the influence campaign. Edit ... there is NOTHING in there that points to collusion or even cooperation of the Trumps and Russia. Manofort evidence is all about his associations. Cohen was all about a business deal that started in 2015, and was halted in the summer of 2016. Papadpopous was a nothing burger. Wikileaks, while suspected to be of Russian origin, the campaign was unaware of those origins at the time, but like any Political Machine, will not hesitate to take advantage of mechanisms that hurt your opponent. Taking advantage and being instrumental to its dissemination are two different things. Flynn was completely above board, again, guilty only of knowing and having dealt with Russians. It goes without saying that , of course Russia was seeking better relationships with the US. That is called diplomacy. It also goes without saying, Russia does what it can to influence elections in foreign countries, and so do we. But NOWHERE in this report does it finger Trump as some Russian troll. If anything, the long list of failed attempts on the parts of the Russians is testimony that the Trumps weren’t having it. DONT GET YOUR PERSPECTIVE FROM A LYING ASS MEDIA OUTLET!!! Go to the source, read and make up your own mind.