Gay parents don't want the same responsibilities after breakup

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUDeek, Aug 23, 2005.

  1. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    That's purely conjecture, regarding whether either would have happened w/o government intervention. I suspect the Industrial Revolution would have lessened the importance of slavery (and the resulting economic costs of maintaining such a system.)

    As for women, giving them the right to vote hardly represents any special protection. In fact, they're not protected constitutionally any more than men are. (That is to say, gender is not a protected class.)
     
  2. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    This thread is about marriage. That's what I was talking about.
     
  3. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    Lessened the importance of slavery... yes, I agree. Lessened racism... not so much.

    That's my point - not that women were given special protection, just that they were given rights that the majority already had. Women are constitutionally protected JUST as much as men are & that's the way it should be.

    I'm in no way shape or form advocating minorities (whether it's sex, race, sexual preference whatever) getting special treatment, just that they should get the same treatment & rights that we enjoy.
     
  4. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    Absolutely. And nowhere does it say "right to marry." That's a statutory provision, not a Constitutional mandate. So if two gays can't enter into a binding marriage contract under the laws of any given state, there remains no deprivation of rights.
     
  5. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    as i have said before, the proper thing for the government to do is to not manage straight marriages either. marriage should be treated like baptism in the eyes of the government.
     
  6. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    OXYMORONS:

    Jumbo Shrimp
    Honest Politicians
    Pretty Ugly
    Gay Parents*

    If the d***dont fit you must (a)quit.
     
  7. TigerWins

    TigerWins Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    157
    That won't work either. Too many legal issues involving legally married people. Just imagine the chaos of dividing up a spouse's estate. Or who gets to make the medical decision on behalf of a spouse, like the Schaivo case. Or child custody issues, etc.

    Many people view marriage as nothing more than some ritual, but it's much more than that with respect to the law.

    Here's a list of Marriage Rights and Benefits
     
  8. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Not to mention the question of who gets to be on top.
     
  9. TigerWins

    TigerWins Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    157
    I was just thrilled to be getting some when I was married. Position was unimportant! :hihi:
     
  10. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Do you take this man to be your wife? For better or worse? For richer or poorer? For pitching or catching? :shock:
     

Share This Page