Former LSU football players arrested (Tyrann Mathieu, Jefferson, Hatcher, Bryant)

I definitely got a good one.

 

No kidding. I remember those days. Zig-Zag or Job roller?

After a bit of "experience" you get to the Camel quality with one hand, ya know?

This has me thinking I'm either old school, or just old. Give me a small, hand carved wood pipe and I'm set.

 

Those little joint-rolling machines were great, but I would actually sometimes roll them TOO tight and you couldn't draw from the j.

Also, you pretty much have to use glass for KB.

 

I can't believe how many people on this board believe that marijuana is harmless. Get your heads out of your rear ends. Anything that you ingest that alters your judgement is potentially harmful. That's why many medications are controlled substances. And marijuana today is not your father's marijuana. It's many times more dangerous. And I haven't even touched the topic of users stealing to support their habits. Yes, it is habit forming. That's why losers like TM7 can't live without the stuff.

 

http://progress.montgomeryadvertise...ested-?odyssey=tab|mostpopular|text|FRONTPAGE


Check out the caption under the 1st picture

 

You need to actually read something that isn't published before 1985. Marijuana is harmless, it's actually beneficial. Everything is habit forming. Have another whiskey pal and step down off the altar.

 

Dated November 2010
http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana
Hope you are not too stoned to read it.

 

Many of us speak from experience, and also have successful careers, families, hobbies, and otherwise perfectly "normal" lives. People who let weed screw up their lives were destined to be losers; it was all just a matter of what they were going to use as a distraction.

Not "more dangerous", more "potent". People very rarely get high and do stupid, harmful things because it makes them docile. Further, whatever you may think you know about weed and permanent brain damage has been proven over the years to be a lie. It can potentially have permanent effects if used before the age of ~16, but I've never heard anyone argue the children should be able to use it.

You're thinking of crack. No one does this for weed. I'm sure there are some exceptions, but a thief is a thief, and weed won't drive them to it the way crack would. Drugs like crack, cocaine, heroin, etc. are physically addictive. Weed is NOT.

Habit-forming is a meritless claim against something. All controlled substancess are, and some non-controlled substances (like caffeine) are, as well.

 

I would argue that "more dangerous" and "more potent" go hand in hand. Harm/danger comes in many forms. What about a person that is so docile that he begins to care about nothing. He could potentially not care enough to provide for his family. That makes him harmful from my perspective.