Florida screwed like us!

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by lsutyger03, Oct 14, 2006.

  1. Deceks7

    Deceks7 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,422
    Likes Received:
    539
    A little off topic, but... After reading the rule about a forward pass, can someone tell me why spiking the ball isn't intentional grounding?
     
  2. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Thank you for this insightful football analysis, Scooter.
     
  3. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Possibly because it isn't being done to avoid a sack. It's just an incomplete pass.
     
  4. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    Boy that's a good one. I had never thought about it in those terms but I'll take a shot until someone who knows helps us out on this one.....
    My guess is that the intentional grounding rule has a stipulation about grounding it to avoid a sack, in which case, would not apply when the intention is to stop the clock and not because of pressure and possible loss of yardage.
     
  5. Deceks7

    Deceks7 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,422
    Likes Received:
    539

    Sometimes the obvious is so hard to see.........thanks
     
  6. Thorny

    Thorny Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    37
    It really wouldn't matter if it were. Under the current rule, intential grounding places the ball at the spot of the foul and a loss of down. Spiking the ball places the ball at the original line of scrimage and a loss of down (because the down happened.) The only difference would be the loss of the 1 yard from the QB standing behind the center.

    If the intentional grounding rule cost an additional 10 yards from the spot of the foul and a loss of down like it used to be, there would be some real meat in the penalty. Because they didn't want to take 10 yards from the offense in this situation, they exempted spiking the ball from the intentional grounding rule.

    GEAUX TIGERS
     

Share This Page