An proudly so. The constitution law on access to the court is found at Amendment Article 1 in that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or the right of the people to petition a redress of grievances. tgsam
There are those who claim this. Law (The legal system of God) vs. Legal (The lawful system of man) Yes that is copied from the Family Guardian Fellowship. They have an entire website full of disinformation on a wide variety of subjects. "A nonprofit Christian religious ministry dedicated to protecting people and families from extortion, persecution, exploitation,socialism, divorce, crime, and sin. Advocate personal liberty, personal responsibility, constitutional and SMALL and accountable government, sovereignty, and religious faith." In this case they are assigning connotations that are not generally recognized.
Oooh! Strike one, two, three in one sentence. :hihi: Yer out! I'm sure the statute of limitations has passed, but best I not comment . . .
Wrong sir! Wrong! Under section 37B of the contract signed by him, it states quite clearly that all offers shall become null and void if - and you can read it for yourself in this photostatic copy: I, the undersigned, shall forfeit all rights, privileges, and licenses herein and herein contained, et cetera, et cetera... Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum, et cetera, et cetera... Memo bis punitor delicatum! [slams the contract copy and the magnifying glass down, continues shouting] Willy Wonka: It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal! You stole fizzy lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and sterilized, so you get nothing! You lose! Good day, sir!
Answers.com The term lawful more clearly suggests an ethical content than does the word legal. The latter merely denotes compliance with technical or formal rules, whereas the former usually signifies a moral substance or ethical permissibility. An additional distinction is that the word legal is used as the synonym of constructive, while lawful is not. Legal fraud is fraud implied by law, or made out by construction, but lawful fraud would be a contradiction in terms. Legal is also used as the antithesis of equitable, just. As a result, legal estate is the correct usage, instead of lawful estate. Under certain circumstances, however, the two words are used as exact equivalents. A lawful writ, warrant, or process is the same as a legal writ, warrant, or process.
again, nobody cares about this definition nonsense. they care about specifics of why something is allowed or not. when i get handcuffed for pot possession, i dont say to the judge "this is unlegal deplomination of my jurisdephlooper rights!". i just take my punishment, then later try to convince everyone that the legalization of drugs is a benefit to society. that is what they care about, not the ramblings of crazyness.
I'm not a juris doctor. I'm convinced that the People have been hoodwinked by the Brotherhood for at least ninety years. Not only do lawyers know nothing that ordinary literate citizens are incapable of knowing, they enjoy no lawful advantage over other citizens. It's time for Americans to learn enough to show the Legal Brotherhood who is the rightful boss in America. Justice Fellowships could expedite the fulfillment of that noble end. tgsam
Maybe ordinary citizens w/ a smattering of an education? Agreed. Whoa, I agreed w/ you both in the same thread! :lol:
