i was asking for you to be more specific, not majestically vague. i could explain every word i said, but i posted like 80 or 110 words maybe. which part confused you?

its case "in" point. a specific case "in" support of the point

Most of it. I'm fine. Thanks for asking.

you asked for links supporting my points. i can provide them if you can tell me which part you dont agree with. but apparently you cannot.

here’s a compilation of some of the G-men’s misdeeds over the last 6 yrs…. It’s a lengthy article so I’ll just post the link.

spoiler alert: the fbi doesn’t appear to be lily-white….


https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/19/think-the-fbi-deserves-the-benefit-of-the-doubt-this-laundry-list-of-corruption-should-make-you-think-again/


Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again

Thanks, but I'm not going to create an account just to read the article. The article title suggests the FBI is guilty of corruption. Name me a government agency that is 100%, lily white clean.

"How it works" is that a private citizen, as is donald trump, can not be in possession of, conceal, or destroy government-owned documents, especially after they've been subpoenaed and he's been warned. It doesn't matter one bit to 18 USC 793, 18 USC 2071, and 18 USC 1519 if those documents were declassified or not... which, of course, is absurd.

If that is what you want to call opening your eyes then yes

Suggest you contact your Optometrist ASAP.

You don't have to, there is a little "x" in the upper right corner, click on it and you can read the article- for free