when you know and accept that he never said the thing about nazis being fine people, and you see biden framing his whole claimed motivation for running around it, and that going unquestioned by mainstream media, it really helps a nigga with critical thinking about the media and their motives.

i think winston just is unsophisticated about media. he believes them. he struggles to accept that they would simply be lying about trump all the time. i understand that. why indeed are they so croooked?

whereas rex is more insecure. he knows, for example, that the premises of liberalism (women and men and all people are equal at everything) are false, but it makes him feel bad and worry about being exposed as a bigot. but the fact is everyone is a bigot. we all know what the world is like. but liberals overreact and go out of their way to signal virtue, being insecure about their own deeply held thoughts. so unlike winston, rex's goal is to call you a bigot to contrast himself against what he is accusing you of. yunno, projection.

feds find nothing incriminating at mar a lago, was just a witch hunt again.

would it be so hard to believe that trump is exactly what he appears to be a loudmouth blowhard new york asshole? and not dr evil the russian agent selling nuclear secrets to saudis?

you guys and your stupid fantasies, its something really

@Rex @Winston1

it served its purpose…

So what. I’m glad he wasn’t going to sell them to a foreign country. However it’s meaningless as an excuse for committing a crime. Notice the government isn’t backing off on it efforts. The documents weren’t his, many were sensitive and he had no right to them.
@Jmg you like to ask questions so here’s one for you. A man steals a Picasso painting. He doesn’t intend to sell but wants it for his private enjoyment. Has he committed a crime? It’s no different here except the stakes are much higher. What happens to the documents when Trump dies? Most likely many will still contain sensitive information.
Why he stole them is secondary to the fact he stole them. Walls!

What an absurd analogy.

Go back to sleep.

What a pithy comeback. I’m awed by your vast intellect

You are too dumb to realize that if you used YOUR analogy correctly, you would understand Trump would ALSO be the artist in that situation.

Donald Trump was the 45th PRESIDENT of the United States. He took records of which HE WAS APART.

Its not like he was a janitor who broke into the Oval.

With all due respect, your brain is malfunctioning with TDS.

Not to mention that it's something that most, if not all, presidents do.

who told you he had no right to them? that is legally undetermined.

again, these documents existed and were brought to the white house to be given to him. whoever printed these documents has an office in langley or the pentagon or whatever, and brought those documents to the white house to present to trump. thats the only reason they exist, and were there, for trump. the president. the boss.

in your analogy, the picasso would be commissioned by trump for his collection.

you keep saying he "stole" them. when something is stolen you generally have to take things from a person who owns it and they no longer have it. he took information. papers. i guarantee whoever printed them out also has a copy. its not like some CIA analyst gave trump a map of a nuclear site in russia and needs it back.