it would be interesting if the documents in question included a letter from Obama. also, I will again ask the question: what is the difference between classified documents and documents with classified markings? bonus question: why did the agency responsible for working with trumps exit team change their policy about record collection?
Well, we know YOU dont read. But I did read it. I noticed you cannot refute anything I post because, you know, I quoted the Supreme Court. Like Rex, you have to rely on imaginings of what could or could not be and what Trump could and could not have done. Then when finally cornered, there is the, " we have to see what the investigation says".... Like this isnt Episode 10 or anything. Put it like this: during the PAST investigations, who was right. Me or you? Who took a nuanced approached and researched and who took the media at their word? Me or You?
Have you seen the photos? All those papers. How does he do it! Play golf. Shit post. Read all that. Plot to take over the world with Russia. Wow. What stamina!
Actually, I did that on my own. I dont know who Tom Fitton is. Did CNN tell you who this guy was? Can you share a link?
No, you didn't, liar. You quoted a District Court ruling that is not binding in this case, even after you were told. LMAO.
LMAO. You copied and pasted some right wing site crap. That's because you DON'T investigate things on your own, and you get your nonsensical talking points from trump, himself, or from his asskissing magats.
This is a right wint site? An archive of cases? Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 | Casetext Search + Citator Or are you so uninformed that because you see ":judicial watch" you dont realize how they label cases?
Yes I did. I quoted the Supreme court cases that REFERCED the DC cases. This is how courts work. They use reference cases. You are ignorant if you think this case will go to trial and these references WONT be used.
