On October 23 of 2016, Polls had HRC up by 12%.... Tell me how "this time is different"? https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/23/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-presidential-polls/index.html
Difference is by now HRC’s lead was shrinking and Comey has either not or just announced the reopening of the email investigation. Trends were favorable to Trump. Now the spread is getting wider and news continues to be negative for Trump. Here is the latest 538 release. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/
Too many think what happened in the past is an indication of what will happen today and tomorrow. The situation is completely different from 2016 and the data shows the difference especially if you drill deeper. Trump has lost support in almost every demographic and he is the focus rather than Biden. As stupid and addled possibly senile as Biden is he projects a likable demeanor. Remember HRC was hated by most. Today the shoe is on the other foot. Trump is the lightening rod of hate. As I have said as recently as the last few days Trump can still will but it’s increasingly unlikely based on the data.
Yes. I questioned the source (I question every source, about everything), went to a "valid" source (yesterday’s data), and believe it or not, reality is a much different picture than what you presented. Of course, you can always doubt the Federal Election Commission if you like.
Today is the 8'th. I just posted evidence HRC had a 12 point lead weeks from TODAY. You are talking with yourt "feelings" Look: Can you explain the trend in October for HRC? Also, there IS negative news for Biden but you know, I guess you have your head in the sand. If you think the past 2016 Trump voters are ignoring all the abuses of power uncovered from the Left/Biden, you are mistaken. They just aren't polling and lying about polling.
My link was the same source: Looks like you are looking at donations included from the primaries or this section you (for some reason) left out.
I apologize. I am trying so hard not to post on political stuff (here, email, Twitter, FB, ANYWHERE). I posted this morning out of pure frustration, and I should not have. The time for changing anyone's mind is long, long past. Confrontational posts serve 0 purpose and I know that. Again, sorry.
Huh? I'm not mad. Your post just came off like you didn't really look into what I posted and attacked the source. It just so happened the data was from your source and broken down by state "individual presidential" donations.
