Election 2020

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Jul 26, 2020.

  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,672
    Likes Received:
    16,607
    You assume far too many things. Best to just ask direct questions like I do.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  2. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    15,191
    Likes Received:
    6,596
    Well another moral equivalency clown. There is no comparison between today's DEMOCRATS and CONSERVATIVES. Welcome back you and Rex will make a great team.
    welcome_to_the_jc27bb.0.jpg
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,672
    Likes Received:
    16,607
  4. kluke

    kluke Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,665
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Chain of custody forms missing signatures? Chain of custody forms missing names of who received them? Chain of custody forms with date errors? Are you fucking kidding me? In a state where the election was run by Republicans this is all you got for your conspiracy?
     
    rockwallfan likes this.
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,672
    Likes Received:
    16,607
    Do you understand what that means? This is with regards to "ballots". Did you only read the title?

    Also, there was a lot more in the hearing. Did you watch? Or are you just trying to deflect? Again, this is just one state and once instance. More like this.....

    Also, saying the state was run by republicans doesn't mean anything. Plenty of Republicans dislike Trump. Take our Winston for an example.

    So now you can go from "no evidence" to "Not good enough evidence". Right?

    Simply put, if you cant follow chain of custody on ballots, how can you verify they weren't tampered with?

    Think of it like this, what if the people making the VAX you took had no chain of custody on sourcing the material to produce the vax, would you trust the shot and take it anyway?

    Like, if they needed X amount of compound A and X amount of compound B but didn't really follow the rules to ensure purity of the compounds. Is this safe?

    Not only did they not source the material correctly, they destroyed the documentation so you couldn't verify. Sound safe?

     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2022
    shane0911 likes this.
  6. kluke

    kluke Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,665
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Pat attention. I never said no evidence, I said not enough evidence. Nothing material to the outcome of the election. Material, so that you understand, means it could impact the outcome.

    Your arguments are redundantly vapid.
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  7. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    I like that…..”redundantly vapid” describes them to a tee.
     
  8. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,672
    Likes Received:
    16,607
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,557
    Likes Received:
    23,811
    Dude, its like giving a blind man the gift of sight but the dumb son of a bitch runs around with his eyes closed. Exactly why I said I'm not doing it again.

    Fuck em
     
    fanatic likes this.
  10. rockwallfan

    rockwallfan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,582
    Likes Received:
    607
    actually, your post fits tRump supporters. in any other era patriots would've never elected such a lying, criminal, rude, repulsive individual. and all of those qualities were known about him before he was elected. he more than lived up to those values once in office. and yet, he's still got pond scum who favor him. but that's where our country is. hard to fucking stomach.
     

Share This Page