Look. Everyone is better served to read themselves and form an opinion. Far better than quoting a news media source.
I dont want to drag this down into media headline but rather the meat of it, so I will just go ahead and say, if you quote anything other than the hard text and mention or reply to me, I ain’t responding.
I'm still looking for a link to the report that I am supposed to read. I don't know how any of us are going to have an opinion until we read it.
I'm not going to give commentary ... just point out some photos of screen shots from the presentation. Dr. Shiva on duplicated ballots .... 17,126 duplicates 25% to 30% of the duplicates occurred after Nov. 4th. The envelopes for many of the duplicates were either unsigned, or not legible, the red line are blanks, the green line are scribbles. The comparison of signed, blank or scribbled envelopes for the 4 weeks leading up to the election vs the 4 days after the election shown in a block graph. The Green Blocks are legible, the Red boxes are either blanks or scribbles. Now .... I'll let you decide if you think this is legitimate. You can question the veracity of the data, but then that can be questioned for any data set. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ed-november-4th-9th-knew-many-ballots-needed/
I don’t want to poop on your implications. If you are implying anything to begin with. I watched his presentation and I do believe his review. It seems straight forward. it talks about signatures but doesn’t talk about who voted for who. That is a big gap between irregularities and actual fraud perpetrated by Biden supporters. It was revealing that even the certified count is not completely accurate. This will be largely ignored.
I think that it is safe to say, that all those alleged ballots that are duplicates will NOT be investigated. They should be! AND ... as you said, the presentation doesn't say who voted for who! For all we know, all the blank and unsigned ballots were for Trump. But again, that is easy enough to determine!! But ... again again ... it won't be followed up! Its a thing about DATA! Data always leads to questions. In most instances, it's the QUESTIONS that are important. Like you said. How many duplicates went to Biden and how many to Trump? What does the election look like without the duplicates? Who duplicated the ballots? What is fraud on the part of the individual voter, or was it fraud on the part of the MC Election Committee ... or was it fraud on the part of an outside group? AS .. I said before .... I don't give a shit about the report! If it doesn't lead to indictments .... then who cares!
Do you think it is ethical ... or even legal for the MD Election Admin to overwrite files in the computer log for the election? https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cials-deleting-computer-election-files-video/
I don’t see indictments in this report. If the evidence was stronger, in who voted for who, then maybe. it is certainly an indictment on the election process. Is this a normal margin of error? Did my vote go to the squirrel as a write in or did it go to someone else? I’ll never know.
NO ... I don't either. But the grounds are set to further investigate and find out just who overwrote the files, and just who was responsible for the duplicated ballots. It won't be investigated. The SCUM who inhabit the halls of politics only have one rule ... NEVER turn on your own. I know a lot of people, like Winston who think Trump should be in jail. But, Trump will never go to jail. If the Democrats ever break the code of never indicting politicians for political wrongs ... they are toast, and they know it. Heaven forbid that the public ever find out what really goes on in politics.
There is actually one item that has been forwarded to law enforcement. " The highlight of the presentations was when Cotton noted that his team identified the individuals who deleted items requested and that he has provided their names to authorities in the state." https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ted-criminal-activities-referred-authorities/
