:cuss::cuss::angryfire:angryfireo:o: And I worked so hard on my "John Boy "Scoop" Walton letter!!! :cry::bncry::huh::sob::rofl:
That is a really BRILLIANT answer...'cause depending on how I read it, it could still go either way.....Gotta admire that. :wink: Have you considered politics as a career?:lol:
Is anyone actually surprised that the story was a load of crap? This is the Reveille we're talking about. They've come out with so many half-baked, personal agenda laden, cock-and-bull stories that you're well advised to take anything that they write with a grain of salt or less. In fact, this is the same Reveille thats in the midst of a legal issue right now because of a reporter who recently wrote an defamatory article based on what her "source" told her. Well, it turns out, there was no source, her quotes were entirely fabicrated, and she basically made all of her facts up based upon her own baised opinions and half-truths. Then, to top it all off, the reporter refused to write a retraction because she didn't think that she did anything wrong. I would not be at all surpirsed if this article is by the same totAL BEEYOTCH of a "reporter". This is the type of top quality reporting that we're referring to here.
Do you care about the LSU football program? We do. I really think you should read what i said again though. Of course we can discuss the hack job and the person who wrote the story. But to rehash exactly what she published is not a good idea.
I said she had cited only one source and I'm sorry but the at least two-source rule still applies with most legitimate journalists.