I'd like to add that in Washington, these guys all sit at the same table and travel in the same circles. The little "-D" and "-R" at the end of their name and hometown on TV doesn't really get in the way of them having a great time and having it at our expense. Why wouldn't they? I can't blame them. We're all too busy pointing fingers at the fringes of each end of the political spectrum where only the wackos reside. Keep speaking in absolutes and generalizations...
I'd like to know where this hot filipina and SabanFan were during the Bush administration... hmm.... opcorn:
Great response. That makes Obama less of a liar? "The stakes are too high and the challenges are too great to play the same old Washington game with the same old Washington players and expect a different result," -Barack Obama You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called ‘change,’ it’s still going to stink,”... “After eight years, we’ve had enough of the same old thing. It’s time to bring about real change to Washington and that’s the choice you’ve got in this election - Barack Obama I didn't come to Washington to take the easy route, or to work for the powerful and the well-connected interests who have run this city for too long. I came here to work for the American people."-Barack Obama Do yourself a favor and research the backgrounds of Obama's collection of Czars and White House senior appointees. They are all Clinton hacks, lobbyists and Washington insiders from way back. Most, if not all have Chicago political connections, and sinister ones at that. Or, you can keep your head safely tucked up your ass and believe everything the liberal media wants you to believe.
How useful would a staff of people with no experience and no political connections be? Any other President bring with him a staff of people with no experience and no political connections? Want to place bets now that the next President will bring with him people with experience and political connections?
Then he should have said that. Instead he tried to make people believe he was going to "change" the old way of doing things. In other words, he's a typical politician, which is fine, as long as he's not continually touted as the second coming of Christ.
Then send me a copy, you owe me book anyway. I'm not contributing a dime to Michelle Malkin. Listen to yourself. You go off on a tangent about Michael Moore at any opportunity, yet you admit that you never watched his documentary. By your own logic, join the ignorant.
And you say you are not a liberal. I saw some of his earlier work so I know how he operates, plus I read reviews and saw clips so I know what his "documentaries were all about. Apples and oranges. Malkin has 75 pages of footnotes. Moore wouldn't know a footnote if it bit him in his XXXL ass.
Why do you care? My opinions are the same no matter how you want to paint me. I know my positions are moderate and that you can't even percieve that a moderate position exists. You just like to cry "liberal" instead of addressing my remarks. I don't blame you. Yeah, that's what I thought, you are ignorant of his movie. Look, I read Malkins columns in the paper, so I know what she's all about, too. By your logic, I'm a friggin' expert on her. :grin:
