my argument is that the NFT market was a poor investment. even if you can luck out in the short term and flip a bored ape or moonbird. in the long term the NFT art market will not just collapse, but flatline. 123 is arguing for other (non art) uses for NFT that have value. i am skeptical of those as an investment as well. i also think the NFT is a lie by definition as it is actually fungible.
the cards are fungible yes? there are x numbers of the dagger of homosexuality in the digital deck right? scarce, but fungible eh?
I am sure it will pump and dump numerous times. Well, I ultimately think it just gets rolled in the blockchain as a default attribute.
but the players dont want the digital signature, they want the card in the game. if i have a digital deck so we play faggotry the gathering, and i bought a new deck and i get the queen of pegging or the dutchess of rainbow flags, and those are super rare, and you also have them we can trade and we both still have the same thing. different digital signature, but same thing. like when i buy a topup for phone minutes. i buy a 10$ prepaid card. i enter the unique pin to my phone and get a gig of data. unique and valuable. but fungible for sure. i was the only person that owned that particular digital code. congrats to me i am gay and cared it was mine. its not actually different. thats the point.
