Color me impressed with how Miles handled the schedule question today...

That's right Red.. We didn't have a choice. It was either accept or leave the conference. I think you can gage how LSU felt about it by Les's talk at the SEC media days and on ESPN. Les has power at LSU but I bet he didn't make those comments without review and input from the Athletic director. Your comment is BS Terry. Typical gump denial.

 

3 years in a row, moron. Not the droids youre looking for?

 

Thats a matter of opinion. If the shoe fits...

 

I never said he wasnt a good poster. Just completely oblivious to the facts as it concerns his own team, ergo moron. Glad you and Red can cast the first stone.

 

At least Bama fans who don't have ESPN2 or ESPNU will get to watch some quality football this year. They will be able to watch LSU games will be on CBS or ESPN.

http://www.fbschedules.com/helmets/2013-sec-helmet-schedule.pdf

 

Much like the continuing assertion there's a conspiracy within the SEC offices that favor one team—when there are 13 other teams that would object if their administration felt the same way—lacks veracity.

I see it as cooler and calmer head prevail when decisions are being made. A trait that goes against the term fan, derived from fanaticism.

If our two roles were reversed I suspect we'd both feel the same way.

 

At season's end, I doubt there will be much of a difference on which avenue carries games more for one team than another.

 

As many fans are- taking that at face value.

But furd, noboby argues with Terry more than red so don't take that-or this- as a pile on. Just trying to keep level-headed discussion here. I've found, over the years, that debating with posters who have strong allegiances to other teams, can be quite educational. It's really opened my eyes to a lot of things.

Just my .02