1. Image of the day . . .

    [​IMG]
    cajdav1, islstl, furduknfish and 6 others like this.
  2. Classic!
  3. I thought my better half was going to have to call 911. I was LMAO and almost choked. :eek:
    LSUDad and northernvatiger like this.
  4. Just so there is clarity about the recusal rule and how it plays in voting....

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...f-voting-protocol-and-recusal-policy/8535167/

    Recused members can't vote for "their" team. How about committee members colluding to make sure a conference or team gets a bias even if their own teams don't? See Jeff Long, Dan Radakovich, and Archie Manning.
  5. I agree get em out of there
    furduknfish likes this.
  6. You do understand Archie counts against LSU right?
  7. You do realize I referenced "conference" benefit. "SEC! SEC!" ;)
  8. Not my point, fkr hates LSU. Betting he doesn't recuse himself if LSU is in the mix.

    MSAWS.
  9. Simple fact of the matter is without a committee the teams would have to qualify like they do in other sports where the conference winners would automatically make the playoffs & they would have to have 2, 4, 8 or 16 conferences. We know that all SEC fans would bitch up a storm if that transpired.

    So a committee has to be involved in the decision. My problem is in having a guy whose job might hang in the balance having any input in the decision. As an example say two AD'S jobs were under severe scrutiny and their teams were in the mix. Think they might make a deal? I do.
  10. I think it should be done the way it used to be done, a combination of voters, polls, and computers. Not some Supreme Court of athletic directors, a fucking Manning and Condasleeza Rice.
    StaceyO and red55 like this.