Is that akin to calling somebody a racist and Nazi because he's not a racist and Nazi? You're a clown. And how is that a "deflection" from your point when you don't even have a valid point?
so you concede that climate related deaths are reducing or no? to be clear, your contention is that they will rise again, this is your prediction?
if i dont have a valid point, describe why the points made were not valid, dont deflect. we notice that and it makes you look silly.
Of the one or possibly two brain cells you have neither one have a spec of common sense nor scientific acumen imbedded in them. Don't color outside the lines in your science books.
Failed doomsday prediction since the first Earth Day. Here are some of the dire predictions from the first Earth Day, compiled by Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute: 1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” 2. “We are in an environmental crisis that threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment. 3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.” 4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 issue of Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” Earth Day, Then and Now,” by Ronald Bailey, Reason.com. May 1, 2000 Earth ‘serially doomed’: The official history of climate ‘Tipping Points’ began in 1864 – A new ‘global warming’ 12-year deadline from Rep. Ocasio-Cortez– Climate Tipping Points date back to at least 1864 – “As early as 1864 George Perkins Marsh, sometimes said to be the father of American ecology, warned that the earth was ‘fast becoming an unfit home for its “noblest inhabitant,”’ and that unless men changed their ways it would be reduced ‘to such a condition of impoverished productiveness, of shattered surface, of climatic excess, as to threaten the depravation, barbarism, and perhaps even extinction of the species.’” —MIT professor Leo Marx Earth “Serially Doomed” – Perhaps the best summary of the tipping-point phenomenon comes from UK scientist Philip Stott. “In essence, the Earth has been given a 10-year survival warning regularly for the last fifty or so years. We have been serially doomed,” Stott explained. “Our post-modern period of climate change angst can probably be traced back to the late-1960s, if not earlier. By 1973, and the ‘global cooling’ scare, it was in full swing, with predictions of the imminent collapse of the world within ten to twenty years, exacerbated by the impacts of a nuclear winter.” Dartmouth Review profile: Debunking the Climate Myth: An Interview with Marc Morano: Morano: “We should actually promote prosperity, technology, and wealth. We should do what we’ve been doing since the first Earth Day in 1970, when we had filthy rivers, dirty air, and massive pollution. We raised awareness and ended up with, in the 50 years since 1970, radical increases in population, radical increases in economic growth, and incredible improvements in just about everything, to the point where even mainstream media and climate activists now admit that the pollution problem has largely been solved. Where we were and where we are now is a light-and-day difference. I would argue that we do the best environmental policy, that we invest in technology, and that we keep doing what we’ve been doing.” Bjorn Lomborg: 50 years after the first Earth Day, the planet’s doing pretty well: Lomborg: In America, for instance, a recent comprehensive study showed that “water pollution concentrations have fallen substantially” over the past 50 years. And a stunning 3.8 billion people in the world have gained access to clean drinking water since the 1970s. Air pollution, the world’s biggest environmental killer, has seen even greater improvements. Outdoor air pollution has declined dramatically in rich countries, in no small measure due to attention from the 1970 Earth Day and the legislation it inspired, such as the landmark US Clean Air Act enacted later that year. For the world’s poor, the deadliest air pollution is indoors. Almost 3 billion of the world’s poorest still cook and keep warm with dirty fuels like dung, cardboard and wood, and the World Health Organization estimates the effects are equivalent to smoking two packs of cigarettes daily. Since 1970, the death risk across the world from indoor air pollution has been cut by more than half. WHO reports: US ranked among countries with the cleanest air in the world – Significantly cleaner air than in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, UK, Japan, Austria, & France– President Trump was right – being in the Paris Climate Accord was not in America’s best interests. Especially since the US is listed among countries with the cleanest air in the world, according to the W.H.O… That’s after all the G7 countries whined about Trump removing us from the accords in 2017 In its 2018 report (& 2019 report) on air pollution, the W.H.O. ranked the United States among the countries with the cleanest air in the world, significantly cleaner than the air in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, Austria, and France. WHO 2019 report: “Northern America remains one of the regions with the lowest overall PM2.5 levels worldwide.” They are all buffoons. They are always wrong yet the climate clowns (Rexie and a couple others here) fall for this everytime. They are funny guys
the authoritarian left needs to imagine things that will happen or almost happened to justify control. like jan 6. they say we almost lost our county. but they refuse to tell me how close we came or how power was transferred and to whom. and the environment. we are perpetually about to destroy the earth at some undescribed time in the future. meanwhile fossil fuels create rich advanced societies than can easily produce enough food and also naturally tend to reduce in population. i remember i was told overpopulation would destroy the earth. now developed countries have the opposite worry, declining fertility rates.
Spot on post. Oh I forgot everything we post is a lie according to our resident climate scientist Rex.
As I have said before life on earth is better since we started using fossil fuels. https://alexepstein.substack.com/p/earth-day-truth-fossil-fuels-make?s=r
I'm 74 years old and have travelled world wide from Greenland to Australia. I'm no tree hugging environmentalist, but believe me when I tell you I've seen weather patterns change. Hell, I've been in Colorado almost 50 years and I have definitely seen the weather patterns change.
