Cindy Sheehan quits Anti-War movement

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by burlesontiger, May 29, 2007.

  1. burlesontiger

    burlesontiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    75
    This is exactly why we were fortunate that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, and not Sept. 11, 2001. There's no way this country could handle WWII today. Can you imagine the public outcry after Kasserine Pass? Bataan? Corregidor?
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,667
    Likes Received:
    6,015
    If it meant the difference between speaking English or Japanese, I don't think the outcry would be as big as you think.
     
  3. TigerFan23

    TigerFan23 USMC Tiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    213
    I disagree. The American people don't have the stomach for a war like WWII was, where we lost thousands in one day at times. I think I posted an article way back when about what it would be like for the American media of today to report on Iwo Jima. I'll try and find it.

    EDIT: Here ya go http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20041011-085231-5401r.htm
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,599
    Likes Received:
    520
    What an a$$.
     
  5. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,599
    Likes Received:
    520
    That's for sure.
     
  6. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,667
    Likes Received:
    6,015
    So if I understand you correctly, you don't think people could tolerate heavy casualties in a war where the very existence of our nation was at stake? If so, I think you underestimate a majority of Americans.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    Wait, Iraq didn't invade the US? :thumb:

    I would much rather watch American Idol than some gloryhound yap about a war and then do nothing to improve the situation.

    VIVA GEORGE HUFF!
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    Probably so, but you would have to remove 2 elements in order to fight and win a war with stakes that high: Liberal Media and Democrats running for office.
     
  9. TigerFan23

    TigerFan23 USMC Tiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    213
    No, I don't think people could tolerate it. I think most people today would be more apt to try and seek a compromise where we could all live together peacefully. Americans are no longer capable of stomaching any kind of armed conflict where lives may be lost.
     
  10. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,599
    Likes Received:
    520
    I have made sentiments to that effect, but the more I reflect on it I really don't think the American people have changed. I think what they oppose is a wagging a long, bloody conflict in which the United States was not attacked. I suspect the nation will support a pre-emptive strike if the conflict is shofrt and does not result in a lot of casualties. Korea had support because it only lasted a couple of years and there was evidence of progress. But I also believe the nation will support a long, bloody conflict if it is in response to a direct attack on the United States. The war in Afghanistan continues to be supported by most people because the Taliban and Al-Quida were responsible for the attack on 9/11. Even if American casualties were much higher than they are in Afghanistan, I believe the American people would continue to support it.
     

Share This Page