A Paris judicial official says investigators have questioned about 30 people after the fire at Notre Dame Cathedral. He said most of them were employees working on the renovation of the monument. The official, speaking anonymously on an ongoing investigation, said the cathedral's fire alarms sounded twice on Monday evening. The first time, some people, including a fire official permanently working on the site, went to check under the roof and saw nothing. The second time it was already too late because the fire was too strong, the official said. He added that 40 to 50 investigators are working on the case but are not allowed to enter the monument yet for safety reasons. https://www.chron.com/news/world/ar...ench-trees-big-enough-to-rebuild-13770470.php https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/fact-check-notre-dame-fire-conspiracy-theories-debunked-1.4382145
None of that is evidence of an accident. It's a presuppostion based on nothing. What does the rudimentary questioning of 30 workers prove? Unless one of them admitted to intentional setting or saw the blaze start, that's a big nothing burger. Fire alarms went off.....and then? Yes, there was a fire. The alarms are not evidence as to the cause. So there are 40 to 50 investigators working on the cause, who haven't been allowed to even enter the edifice but they already KNOW it's an accident? There is NO evidence. If it was an accident, then what started it, specifically? Other churches have been set on fire in France since January. This was St Sulpice just a month ago... It's the start of the Christian Holy Week. Interesting timing. Just 3 years ago, a cell of radicalized French women guided by Islamic State commanders in Syria were behind a failed terror attack against Notre Dame. There is ZERO evidence, and probably never will be, of an accident, because any potential evidence was incinerated.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/fact-check-notre-dame-fire-conspiracy-theories-debunked-1.4382145 you just hate all Muslims, I think that's the overriding factor in your and other people's minds,.. there's a lot of jumping to conclusions, assumptions based mostly on religious bigotry.
if these folks were religious bigots, wouldnt that be justified? islam is in fact terrible. are there any numbers of murders that can be caused by an ideology that you would believe made it acceptable for us to dislike it?
extending that logic,.. should we hate the Catholics because they at least placidly supported Hitler's persecution of the Jews? I believe religions are the biggest curse the world has ever known
True, but I rank them. Muzzies are by far the worst and do not assimilate. I can tolerate the rest because they conform to most societal standards.