Yea. They were all busy having sex in the capital with orgies, gangbangs, and drunkenness'. I am not sure if they taught preschoolers drag, but we are.
You need some history lessons young man. There were a slew of contributing factors to Rome's fall, many of which came before "degeneracy." Let's start with the Barbarian invasions and the Hun invasions, military overspending and spreading their military might too thin, economic troubles, government corruption and political instability caused by the rise of Christianity....this list could go on and on for a while before "degeneracy" would be on it. Not to mention that empires do not fall for one singular reason, it's never that simple. The left isn't trying to destroy family units. That's ridiculous.
Where am I wrong? I've read a lot on it. Interested to see what I've missed. Interesting. Like your constant referencing Abortion to Religion, would you say the left has more or less single family units than the right? Or is that not a game you want to play now?
Obviously you missed the entirety of my post when I listed a littany of other, more prominent reasons for the fall of Rome. You listed one and only one, which was the least of these at best. I have no idea and it's irrelevant. I don't play games
Correct just as religion is irrelevant to the discussion of when it is ok to kill babies or not. Glad you made it to the finish line.
LOL....that's rich. Calling finish line long after we've crossed it pal. Look, now you are just trying to steer things toward what you feel is a better subject for you. I never made any claims about the family unit or however you feel that I did. I made a simple claim that religious people have been the driving force behind the efforts to overturn Roe v Wade (at this point I should just copy and paste this) all along. Who else has it been? Good Lord man....you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. You've already agreed with me about it so why can't you just move on.
Its not an argument. I am right. You were not. Like Rex, you make it about religion. Surprisingly, none of the legal considerations did. Why is that?
You sure are protective of religion for a guy who says he isn't religious. That said, I never made anything about religion. I simply said that religious people have been the driving force behind overturning Roe v Wade and no one but you has disputed that. And you even agreed with it, at least at one point you did. Honestly, I don't really care enough to continue with you about. As I said I have no further point to make and you surely have not all along.
I thought you had better things to do? Also, why would I attempt to dispute a point that is irrelevant? It would seem the smart thing to do would be to prove why it is irrelevant. As I did. If it was relevant, it would seem the smart thing to do on your part would be to mention, in some way, why bringing up religion is important to the legal discussions about killing babies or not killing babies. You did none of that.
