I don't debate ignorant liberals. Your entire rant was about Bush who hasn't been President for 2 years. It's irrelevant.
Are you stupid? I'm going by the way you can't refute a damn thing he said. You don't debate anybody, which is smart of you because you're lousy at it. You just toss out witticisms on good days and lame insults on bad ones. What have you got for me today?
On 11/3 we'll all huddle up and discuss the new future of this country, As for Fairlee Boy, like Ms. Hart, I am exhausted dealing with you ideologists who refuse to see that Obama is flushing us down the toilet. I will no longer argue with you jackasses (in terms of the Dem symbol, of course). After the November elections we can intelligently discuss the bright prospects for recovery. If you want to malign Bush, fine. You have plenty of ammo. Just leave me out of it because I have my hands full with Hope and Change.
Easy, my clairvoyant friend. You don't know anything about me or my politics. Here is what you know, per my post: 1) Any maligning of President X over vacation time in BS. 2) I don't think tax cuts for the top 2% are the way out of the mess we are in. 3) Putting American soldiers lives at risk in a war we as a nation were ill-equipped to fight is an abomination. 4) You think orange shirts are gay. That's all I was saying. Here's to a great game on Saturday.
it is happening in washington, maybe we should discuss george washington. the issue is whether tax and spend is a good idea. it isnt. regardless of who is president. economies are not fixed with taxes. they might be fixed with spending and debt, but they are damaged by taxes.
