Biden's Disinformation Board Is Led by Woman Who Thought Hunter's Laptop Was Russian Disinfo

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spenc...t-hunters-laptop-was-russian-disinfo-n2606508

this idea that we need govt to manage what is true for us is dangerous.

 

i have often discussed the rhetorical strategies used these days. one is the constant deflections to accusations of hypocrisy, typically in the format : "if you are about X now, why didnt you care about X when Y did it! HYPOCRITE"

remember, the issue is never who is a hypocrite. the issue is the issue. jen psaki employed this technique with regard to criticism of the ministry of truth:

https://nypost.com/2022/04/29/biden-disinfo-czar-nina-jankowicz-ripped-over-tiktok/

"“For anyone who’s critical of it, I didn’t hear them being critical of the work under the former president,” Psaki said."

well to be fair, jen, i was opposed to trump threatening, for example, action against social media. but who the fuck cares what i think! thats not the issue! lets say i am a terrible hypocrite, so what! we are not trying to uncover flaws in people personally, we are trying to analyze policy! this is a deflection and its very very common today when the only goal is to call the other guy a racist hypocrite.

i am amazed that the ministry of truth exists. surely we are not so afraid of information that we need a govt clearinghouse to save us?

this is another time to unearth the mencken quote: "
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary"

we have to stop paying the govt to control us and telling us what to think.

 

That woman is an all out NUT!!!

 

That is understated by a wide margin.

 

the woman who poorly judged the biden laptop to be russian disinfo is the person now given this exact task, determining what is disinfo. find the person that is a failure at X, then make them the czar of X, when X is a thing the govt should not even be doing.

 

Same people telling you that the election was legit

 

"Voters deserve that context, not a fairly tale about a laptop repair shop."

- biden minister of truth

 

There’s ample evidence that Hunter was a crime enterprise on his own. Theirs is a growing body of evidence the ties the current occupant of the White House to his (Hunter’s) criminality. This needs much more attention and scrutiny. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

No, there really isn't. We would have already seen it.

In the meantime, Jared Kushner pocketed $3.1 BILLION while working from the White House. THAT'S what needs to be investigated, so I'm really at a loss to understand your "what's good for the goose" comment.

 

nah that was invested, he has to return that money. he surely gets a %, but its not billions pocketed

biden said he would make the saudi murderers a pariah but begs them for oil. this is because of his anti oil policy that you both favor and oppose.

dont agree that you favor and oppose it? ok, well answer this:

your claim is that biden has increased energy production. he claimed he would phase out fossil fuels but he has done the opposite. do you agree with biden (who is lying) that he will phase out oil production (which will necessarily raise prices) or do you agree with biden that we should set oil production records?


remember, these are your words