true that it came from a book but in the Playboy interview Trump even said that it was true. To me this typifies the problem with Trump supporters. "They took two words" is your answer. Those two words just happen to be "They're Rapists." Words matter and it doesn't matter if it's a wordy Faulkner novel or a haiku, every single one of the words matter. He called them rapists. The number of words it takes to say that doesn't matter.
Again I give the first statement no validity, it's hearsay. As for the second. His statement was not all Mexicans are racist which is what your saying. His statement was some illegals crossing the border were and that is a true statement. If you wanted to be honest you would admit that to be true also.
He didn’t call all Mexicans Rapist ... he said among the ones coming there are Rapist, and the news stories verify that fact in a weekly basis.
Your boy said it was "probably true." I didn't say that. The author of the book didn't say that. When questioned about what the author of the book wrote about Trump saying blacks were lazy, Trump said, "that's probably true." Read the article...it's right there for you to see and you don't have to take my word for it my friend. You can split that hair any way you want but go ask Hispanics how they took it. HWR point number three was that Trump flirts with racism. Since then you've all done your level best to convince us that we are wrong about that. But it's not just HWR and I who think this...a plurality of voters do too. Here is some reading material for you: https://www.newsweek.com/half-ameri...additional-13-percent-are-unsure-poll-1518272 https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-...ist-59f7adcf-776e-4ef1-bfd6-ff3b04ded233.html So your notion that point three from HWR is completely wrong runs afoul with most people in this country.
Why is it that Trump always needs someone to come along behind him and redefine everything that he said? Ask Hispanics how they took his statement. Further, in the larger context these kind of statements never end from Trump. If he had only said it once then I might give him the benefit of the doubt, and accept that he misspoke. But given the propensity with which he makes such references, saying "he didn't really mean it that way" just doesn't pass the smell test.
Of course because the media isn't honest and only prints the 3 words with no context which only proves my point. And I didn't argue with hwr on this subject
I agree with a lot of what you are saying, but you are wasting your time. You could have a video of Trump committing and confessing to murder and these folks would tell you that the 10 minutes before you turned on the camera were the most important.
If it was self defense then yea, the 10 minutes before is pretty important. Kind of like this BLM shit everyone is raging about.... But yea, keep the narrative going that actions are in a vacuum of time and before and after have no relevance....
LOL....exactly. You should post more my friend. I know I am wasting my time with them but I enjoy the sport of it.
