Berkeley Earth Study Group..Global Warming

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by HalloweenRun, Oct 23, 2011.

Page 3 of 12
  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    "The IPCC report is not like a weblog at all. It is a multidisciplinary, multi-author, multi-national report that is edited like a textbook. Of course it is not a refereed scientific journal, but all of the authors publish in the journals and all of the research included is cited and has withstood journal publication and comment, including standard peer reviews."



    Well yea, they just omit anything that disagrees with their models...


    "It is the same story with the misleading comment in the SPM mentioned above ("The linear warming trend over the last 50 years is nearly twice that for the last 100 years"). This statement was not in the original version reviewed by the scientists. It was inserted into the final draft that was only commented on by Governments. The Chinese Government suggested deleting this, pointing out that 'These two linear rates should not compare with each other because the time scales are not the same'. Well done to the Chinese Government for spotting that. Too bad their valid comment was ignored by the IPCC."

    How the ipcc invented a new calculus - globalwarmingquestions
     
    LSUpride123, Oct 23, 2011
    #21
  2. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    i cant help you if you dont understand the concept of causality.
     
    martin, Oct 23, 2011
    #22
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    LSUpride123, Oct 23, 2011
    #23
  4. PURPLE TIGER

    PURPLE TIGER HOPE is not a strategy!

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,186
    Likes Received:
    395
    Don't worry about all this left wing kook talk. We're not going to let this "cap & trade" crap happen!

    Period! Talk "science" all you want...spin discussions...blame humans...and attempt to put money in corrupt pockets like Solyndra. Even so it won't happen...guaranteed! :thumb:

    Weak left wingers and even weaker wimps (who claim to be moderates on this site) will get their asses whacked in this battle.

    Time to get rid of their leader Obama and all his failed policies. He has screwed Louisiana and it's time to start drilling again! "Green jobs" is as worthless as "shovel-ready". They're both mythical.

    The great part of all the "science" is that it has NO impact on me. I like my fossil fuels and NOBODY can stop me.
     
    PURPLE TIGER, Oct 23, 2011
    #24
  5. PURPLE TIGER

    PURPLE TIGER HOPE is not a strategy!

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,186
    Likes Received:
    395
    Kill people?...no...but you should be careful as I wouldn't hestitate to flatten your Moped with my SUV. :D

    [​IMG]
     
    PURPLE TIGER, Oct 23, 2011
    #25
  6. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Untrue. They only omitted what was unsupported by the facts.
     
    red55, Oct 24, 2011
    #26
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I understand it far better than you, amigo. You have tried to make this point before and failed badly. Give it up.
     
    red55, Oct 24, 2011
    #27
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    What "battle' is that? You'll have to do far better than you're doing here.
     
    red55, Oct 24, 2011
    #28
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    You need to make your own points here. I'm not going to argue with an article. But this one is so absurd it can shot down quickly.

    Of course there is an explanation for the 1945-1949 cooling period. Just look at the graph.

    [​IMG]

    The period is question is simply the downside of the bulge in the curve produced by WWII. War production was at an all-time high all over the world. Use of gasoline, oil, and coal increased immensely and the the carbon byproducts of many explosions, fires, and battles created a huge influx of carbon, culminating in the fire bombings of the cities of China, Europe, and Japan and the nuclear attacks.
     
    red55, Oct 24, 2011
    #29
  10. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    again, there is not much i can do if you think you can prove a factor is relevant without actually studying the system with that factor removed, in order to isolate that factor. this is how science works. your inability to understand is it fascinating.

    also you do not understand what it means to "prove" something. even the ipcc does not claim to have "proven" AGW. they say 90%, which is of course political nonsense.

    you have lost your ablity to be analyze something fairly because of your politics.
     
    martin, Oct 24, 2011
    #30
Page 3 of 12

Share This Page