1. I don't think you can really say that the Constitution gives one individual life or death power over another individual.

    To speak your languange it is an unlawful usurption of power.
  2. Would the baby be less dead?

    But it's not yet a house? So no big deal right?
  3. But we're only talking about one individual and her power over her own medical condition.
  4. It may be a very big deal. But it's the owners deal and nobody else's business, especially the government.

    Every other matter in the world and you are against government involvement, interference, or control, except for this most private of family matters. I say that nobody outside the family, their doctor, or their clergy has any right to interfere.
  5. yes, if the father did not consent and it was required by law. youre a bright guy. what gives?
  6. GTFO DUDE!! It's everyone else's business when they wanna use our money to do it!

    Let her pay for it herself then!!!!
  7. government doesnt (and shouldnt) work that way.

    are you one of those that protest property taxes because you dont have school age kids?
  8. How bout the babies well being?
  9. No. We are talking about two things. That explains the different DNA.
  10. What babies? :huh: