You know odd thing is that this late in the season and the only four teams in the SEC that are bowl eligible are LSU, Alabama, South Carolina and Kentucky. You know it will change by December, but it sure seems odd this late in the season. ldskule: ldskule: ldskule: ldskule: ldskule: ldskule: ldskule:
I agree. This year has been weird to say the least. The East teams are all beating up on each other and the top three teams in the West are running away with it. When UA, AU, and LSU finish their round robin of games, it will be interesting to see who's on top.
Yes, that is all I was trying to do, and I also now understand your position better. I hope you are right and I am wrong. Thank you for the clarification. :thumb:
No problem. I am realist like most other objectional people... but I am also a die hard LSU fan who has watched LSU football when we sucked to the point we're in now. I also see some games not just one where Bama had it in the bag and let them off the hook... like we did TN a few years ago... i'm just not convinced that Bama can contain us the way they did TN. I apologise if I have upset any objectional LSU fans or hurt the feelings of the Bama fans here... I just see LSU walking away with this game and I call things the way I see it.
Actually, they got off on a technicality....they couldn't find anyone in Alabama who could prove the objects in question were, in fact, books.
Except in the past, Nick didn't have this lying thing down like he now has. I think he's learning from this Bama job that winning comes before integrity.
http://www.al.com/sports/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/sports/1193214222119040.xml&coll=2 good article with the latest. it says that if the kids bought books for other kids they're in trouble. looks like what the bammers are saying about 4 games is true. funny they'll play for the iron bowl.
Why? It sure seems to be taking up a lot of your time and I would hate to left you without something to do. :thumb:
