She has a lot of experience in this area. tee hee Hard to imagine those kids would be so careless. Surely they're given the talk if and when that goes on. Let's ask @TerryP, he'll know.
Very Auburnesque from the USC fan. Alabama's compliance department was one of the first in the NCAA to vet all automobiles for athletes. That vetting covers with whom it's insured, who is paying the insurance, where the down payments come from, who is making the payments ... and on down the line. @tirk mentions the Charger thing (a rumor started by Auburn fans back in 2008.) When they took it to the NCAA and SEC they were laughed at; literally. Why? Because both the NCAA and SEC knew the vetting policies involved with compliance. (And, BTW, when that shit started in 2008 with Auburn I posted the very same thing here.). You've got this story really, really screwed up. I mean, TapWrong.
Sorry, that is incorrect. The judges would have accepted "cuz we bama" or "part of the process". Edit: Is the vetting policy to ensure each starter gets a vett?
Sorry but that doesn't mean shyte. Vetting is simply another term for CYA. You cannot possibly believe that all those college kids with those expensive cars shouldn't raise eyebrows? You really believe they were properly acquired and that no money at all came from Bama boosters? Holy crap dude. Of course they did. I don't care if you vetted a new asshole for each of them. Nobody believes what you are attempting to sell....I don't even think you believe it. Certainly not all....but it does highlight both the vehicle issue as it related to the overall issue and the irony of a Bama player having a similarly upgraded Impala but gets no attention whatsoever. I could lay out the whole USC issue but I've done it plenty of times already and this thread is about Bama.
Just when I thought homerism had already been taken to the top floor. This mother fucker jumps on the secret elevator and goes 10 floors higher.
