Nothing was touchy about my post, you are the one who got sensitive, with the Bush Hilter thing, that must have struck a nerve.
That makes no sense. I assume you mean that you are willing to take a chance on Obama despite the fact that he's ill prepared for the job rather than "suffer" through more years of conservative shenanigans.
Touchy, defensive...call it what you will. :yelwink2: My original posting of that thumbnail was in response to your "typical Republican scare tactics" crack. It was intended to show you that the GOP isn't the only side that can play that game.
No you called it touchy, not what I want to call, I want you to prove it. I just responded to your Hitler comment, because you quoted my post when you posted that Hilter Bush comparison. Stay on course here.
Oh, don't worry. I'm not one to take my eye off the ball. You made a crack about "typical GOP scare tactics" to which I responded with that thumbnail, attempting to illustrate that both sides can and do play that game. You got kind of huffy and defensive claiming that YOU never called Bush Hitler, etc. I don't know why I'm reiterating all this. It's right there for the world to see. If you didn't discern my original intent, I'm sorry. I'll try to make myself clearer in the future.
a crack, its the truth look at all the smear ads they put out in Tennessee about Obama, look at all the emails they are being circulated. It maybe a crack to you, but its the facts. Thats was my original intent, im sorry that you twisted it into your own logic. My respond to your Bush statement was in response to you, quoting my post about GOP scare tactics, when I wasnt directly talking to you . So you got touchy and defensive about the phrase "GOP Scare tactics", when that wasnt even directed towards you, but you felt the need to respond to me, because of your sensitivity about how republicans act. Now thats definitely for the world to see.
That's part of it. McCain's drift to the right and his age and medical condition is part of it, too. Plus McCain's not thoroughly experienced either and has other flaws. You don't even like him but you're voting for him because he "Not Obama". I know how that goes from 2004. I was a big McCain guy in 2000, he would have been better and smarter than Bush. But his time has now past. I just don't think he's smarter than Obama. And I swore after the election of George Bush that I would never vote for the dumber of two candidates again. If I take a chance on a guy, I'm picking the smartest guy. That and the Republicans have to be benched for a while until they come back to their senses and play better ball.
And if you think that the GOP is the only side that engages in this, then you're just a hack, plain and simple. Like I said before....yeah. OK. :lol:
