there is a large difference between what i believe, and what i can prove. i believe the sun will rise tomorrow. i cannot prove it. i believe it. i do not believe the sun wil leave and decide to fly to another galaxy. i really cnnt prove that it wont. if you assert that it will, you are stupid. i cannot prove you are wrong, but you are still stupid for asserting nonsense. try to understand that the inability to prove something false does not make it true. its a very simple thing. and yet it trips up billions of faggotty ass morons.
where is your evidence to the contrary? I have made nothing up, I simply theorized the possibility of the existence of a supreme being and you disputed it. The onus of proof is on you at this point. I never offered that I have proof, simply that I believe. You were the one who said the existence of a supreme being was stupid. To think that my assertion is stupid then you must have evidence otherwise that you can display to show my stupidity. Thus far you have failed to do so.
just curious, what are you basing this theory on? is it? you are the one with the theory. i have no theory to prove. if i claim i can fly to pluto, do you believe me immediately and place the onus on those who wish to prove i cannot? am i not the one asserting something?
you start thinking about the universe, realize that atheism is the only sane position, we start advancing science and reason and live happier lives, appreciating the world for what it is instead of what we invent.
listen to your own advice Martin.... try to understand that the inability to prove something true does not make it false. and you claim that I am not the one who understands logic.
does it make it true? why do you keep asserting that this god is true? i ask for your evidence and you just act like a niggercunt. maybe it means the truth is undetermined. and why would you believe something that is undetermined? why not lack belief is the think that lacks truth? whay not lack theism, and be A-theist
so a belief in a supreme being means that we cannot advance science and reason and live happy lives? the last time I checked our scientific pursuits were a pursuit for truth; hence the scientific method. if we learn that God really does exist does that preclude us from advancing science or does it mean that our science has reached it's pinnacle?