I watched the auburn game again today. Watching the offense totally shift gears in the 2nd half made me wonder. Was it intentional to run the offense like that so that the defense would get as much experience as possible before Georgia ? And cut down on injury chances at same time. That, to me, is kind of a win win scenario.
LSU starts the second half with an Int. 9 times out of 10 Landry has that one. Years back after an Int, the offense would have went into a shell. LSU threw 14 passes in the second half, connecting on 9 for 160 yards.
Didn't need resurrected at all. Nobody in their right mind (or wrong mind if we drank the purple kool-aid) is impressed with this d
MM was correct for questioning the defense. Although he underestimated how bad we are. I even said in the gameday thread this defense isn't as bad as 2008. I will have to rethink that.