Al Quada and our news media, Democrats have something in common

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Sourdoughman, May 17, 2005.

  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    No we don't. If you can't cite any examples of the crimes you speak of, I assume you are just making them up. I will never understand somebody making accusations that they can't back up.

    I did the research, amigo. The right-wing editorials you cite did not tell the whole truth.

    "The application for stay presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied."

    With that brief decision, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Juan Miguel Gonzalez to return home with his son, Elian Gonzalez. They did so on Wednesday, June 28, 2000. Elian Gonzalez is the 6-year-old Cuban boy rescued at sea in November 1999, and brought to the United States.

    This page lists the documents on the Immigration Website, and on other Websites, concerning the Government’s decisions and actions in this case.
    US Citizenship and Immigration Services

    I see. You refuse to offer any evidence of your comments that Clinton was above the law, but you demand that I prove you wrong about little Elian. OK, listed above is the entire record of government decisions and actions on the Elian Gonzales case. You can read them all if you wish, there is a lot of political maneuvering and posturing, but the bottom line is that the Supreme Court, The 11th Circuit Court and a Florida District court decided the matter according to the law of the land. Here are just a few statements by the Attorney General on the rulings.

    WASHINGTON, DC -- The United States Supreme Court today declined to accept for review the case of Elian Gonzalez. The Court's action means that the injunction put in place by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals will expire at 4:00 PM eastern time today, and Elian Gonzalez will be permitted to depart the U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno issued the following statement:

    "I am very pleased that the Supreme Court has declined to review the case of Elian Gonzalez. The law has provided a process, and this little boy now knows that he can remain with his father. All involved have had an opportunity to make their case--all the way to the highest court in the land. I hope that everyone will accept the Supreme Court's decision and join me in wishing this family, and this special little boy, well."


    STATEMENT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO ON THE 11 TH CIRCUIT
    COURT'S DECISION IN THE ELIAN GONZALEZ CASE

    "We are pleased that the Court has upheld our decision that only Juan Miguel Gonzalez can speak for his son Elian on federal immigration matters. These three federal appellate judges have now joined with a federal district court judge and a Florida state court judge in recognizing the authority of the INS to make this determination.


    WASHINGTON, DC -- The 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals today denied the motion by the Miami relatives of Elian Gonzalez for a rehearing or a rehearing en banc in the case of Elian Gonzalez. Attorney General Janet Reno issued the following statement.

    "We are pleased that the 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals has acted unanimously in denying the motion for rehearing in the case of Elian Gonzalez. Now that the Court has conclusively upheld our decision, I am hopeful that this father and son will soon be able to move on with their lives together."

    So I am a fool, eh Sourdough? OK, the gloves are off I guess. Don't expect me to pull any punches in the future. I won't be calling you names, but I will expose your pretzel logic and unsubstantiated allegations without hesitation or restraint.
     
  2. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Was that an intention Conan reference? Aleeeetle Elian! :rofl:

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,326
    Likes Received:
    575
    Red,
    You forgot the dates??
    Dates mean something here, pre-invasion vs post invasion of that home.
    The invasion happened on April 22 anything after that was irrelavent.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli%E1n_Gonz%E1lez
    Negotiations over how/when to transfer Elián were on-going when, in the pre-dawn hours of April 22, U.S. Marshals burst into Lazaro's home. Attorney General Janet Reno - who secured a custody order from a magistrate 10 hours before the raid - had the INS revoke Elián's visa, allowing her to arrest him for being an illegal alien.

    "Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, a Clinton ally, dismisses this warrant and says the administration, “acted lawlessly.” As he told Fox News: “It’s a dangerous day for all Americans.”
    This magistrate new nothing about this case.

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2000/05-22-2000/vo16no11_elian.htm

    Three days before the raid, on April 19th, a federal court had delivered a stinging rebuke to Janet Reno and the Clinton administration, and had handed Elian’s Uncle Lazaro a major victory. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit granted Lazaro’s motion for an injunction prohibiting Elian’s removal from the United States. The court also denied the request by the Immigration and Naturalization Service to issue an order directing Lazaro to deliver Elian to the INS, at the place and time mandated by the INS.

    Cllinton above the law, regardless of this particular case I say again yes and I gave
    you examples, Sandy Burger, then there are the numerous people that have gone to
    jail around the Clintons.
    The things that happened in this story along with others such as Waco were handled
    terribly in my opinion and I will never forget or forgive the Clinton Administration for that, it may not be against the law but it should be.

    You see nothing wrong with the excessive use of force in these cases?
    Did I make up or imagine the things that happened to harm people such as camera
    crews or the innocent children that died at Waco?
    Alan Dershowitz statements?
    I read through your information provided and see nowhere that enabled the Clinton
    Justice Department to do what it did on April 22, 2000.
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Yeah, Jackboot Janet was pretty rough on right-wing militant kooks armed with military weapons that refused to surrender to the law. That's what an Attorney General is supposed to be--tough on crime. This became even more important after McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma City. The fire that spread at Waco was another foul-up by the incredibly fouled up ATF. No one intended to kill the cult children.

    Now, drawing down on little Elian may have been kind of much, but the Cuban Exiles had promised to defend Elian with their lives. So Jackboot Janet sent in a SWAT team and that ended that crap. She surely was no pussy. That was Al Gore's job.

    Even if we state, for the sake or argument, that Janet Reno failed to exercise adequate control over both operations, she still didn't break the law . . . she represented the law and was never charged nor convicted of any crime.

    Sourdough, What I originally objected to was your statement: "the Clinton Justice department would go after innocent Americans using all the alphabet agencies."

    I say these examples don't qualify. Elian Gonzales was not an innocent American. He was a illegal Cuban immigrant. The Cuban exiles that were holding him were not innocent Americans either. They defied an order to deport Elian, legally issued by the INS.

    David Koresh was not an innocent American. His gun cult defied the law and refused to surrender to the authorities. He admitted his guilt on videotape. Nobody went there to kill the innocent children, they were there to arrest Koresh and his illegally armed adult militia.

    I just don't believe the Clinton "alphabet agencies" went after innocent American citizens. The radicals at Waco and Ruby Ridge were not innocents. That's who Reno went after.
     
  5. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    elain, ruby ridge, waco, all that stuff was handled correctly.
     
  6. Mystikalilusion

    Mystikalilusion Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've been seeing a lot of this lately. Anytime someone gets the obvious upper hand in a conversation, the other person starts calling names (ie Salty to me). They need to grow up and learn that healthy arguments are good.

    Just because I call Bushie names, doesn't give them the right to disrespect me. I can call Bushie names just like they can call Michael Moore and Gore names, I'm all right with that.
     
  7. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,326
    Likes Received:
    575

    Just what we need, a so-called shrink on this board.
    Did Sandy Burger break the law?
    Those kids are innocent Americans whether you believe it or not.
    Are you saying that they aren't?

    They say you can't pick your kids well you can't pick your parents either.
    It makes me angry when the Clintonites get away with all kinds of things
    and no one cares but anyone who has anything to do with Bush is a rotten
    sob even if they are a minority holding a position.

    Martin, I disagree with your statement.
    I'll be honest and say I think Ruby Ridge happened when the first Bush was in office.
    I'm no fan of the first Bush but he was better than any candidate out there,
    It would send chills down my spine when he talked about the new world order.

    We will have to disagree then won't we?
     
  8. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,326
    Likes Received:
    575
    You say know laws were broken so you don't believe any of the 1st ten amendments
    were violated?
    How about the freedom of the press and those journalists you overlooked who had various injuries by the Alphabet Agency.
    I'll say it again, they would attack Americans, innocent as far as those children.
    They still attacked Americans and didn't go after terrorists.
     
  9. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    This all comes down to a matter of political preference. I mean, here you are ranting on and on about the Clintons, but you're pretty forgiving towards the shrub. Know what I mean? It's the other side of the coin.
     
  10. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,326
    Likes Received:
    575
    I'm not forgiving them, just telling it like it is.
    How is it that everyone in the Clinton Administration can be so good and everyone in todays Bush Administration can be so bad.
    One was responsible on raids and killing Americans and the other not.
    This presidents adminstration has no tracks like the other one you know what
    I mean?
    I would be just as angry with them if they were responsible for Waco and things of that sort.
    I even said I didn't care for the 1st Bush and his agenda, as far as this one
    goes I don't agree with him on everything especially the borders.
    I have critized this adminstration at times at this here forum.
    No way you can paint me in that corner :nope:

    I disagree.
     

Share This Page