Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex_B, Oct 28, 2010.

Page 2 of 18
  1. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    all but 9/11 happened after the luncheon. should he have been arrested at the luncheon? still not sure what the problem is. i dont think they were giving out top secret info at the luncheon or anything.
     
    martin, Oct 29, 2010
    #11
  2. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    He knocked over the salt shaker
     
    Rex_B, Oct 29, 2010
    #12
  3. flabengal

    flabengal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    84
    My question is why did this guy feel so comfortable about attending the luncheon?

    I would say this is just further evidence that Al-Qaeda is on the CIA payroll....
     
    flabengal, Oct 29, 2010
    #13
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The DoD was recruiting friendly muslims to do propaganda for us and Rumsfeld invited a guy from the other side to consider. A guy that the FBI had connected with three 9/11 bombers. Read the quote, they vetted these rags politically and failed to vet them with the FBI and intelligence services.
     
    red55, Oct 29, 2010
    #14
  5. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    at least flabengal has the stones to admit that he is a truther.
     
    martin, Oct 29, 2010
    #15
  6. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    you are not understanding my question. what is the negative of inviting the wrong dude to a party? he got to eat free food?

    did he blow up the party? learn top secret info?
     
    martin, Oct 29, 2010
    #16
  7. flabengal

    flabengal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    84
    I think they are dismayed at the lack of security/background checks right after 9/11.
     
    flabengal, Oct 29, 2010
    #17
  8. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    yeah they wouldnt want the wrong guy to get a hold of cocktail weenies at this very important meeting where they revealed the most closely held secrets of the pentagon.
     
    martin, Oct 29, 2010
    #18
  9. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    It's Red. Bush was in office. If this happened under Obama, Red would have no problem with it.
     
    SabanFan, Oct 29, 2010
    #19
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I'll use small words. They were recruiting agents and foolishly invited the enemy to the event. Geez.
     
    red55, Oct 29, 2010
    #20
Page 2 of 18

Share This Page