AIP Party, Palin and Husband Members?

So the question remains, if you think this is a valid topic discussion, do you think the topics on Obama are valid?

You have seen me do this? Where?

Again, you have seen me do this? Find the thread where I claimed to be supporting this ticket or have joined in on character assassination of Obama. So save your calls of hypocrisy for people you can actually prove it on, ok? And don't try to cop out by saying you meant everyone else. You quoted and addressed me.

Did you actually even read my post or just wait for someone to respond so you could vent your anger? I said her past record and personal beliefs are valid discussions. Your anger is blinding you.

A great many things have been documented about Obama, some true, some false, but you think anything negative about him deserves no discussion. You have been very consistent in every thread.

I didn't claim that you did. I very clearly stated the left media was doing this, that it dominated all coverage of her, and was in no way an attempt to question her policies, but instead an attempt to destroy her simply because they fear her.

 

Not sure what you mean? Todd Palin, to this point, has stayed in the background. Michelle Obama has inserted herself onto the front line. Thus, she becomes relevant. Her views, etc become fair game for criticism. It's not hypocritical for me to object to your bringing up Todd Palin's background while scrutinizing Michelle's.

 

If it has to do with his judgement or policy then yes its valid.

I dont have to cop out, you missed the point. I am speaking about the relevance of her judgement. I think you just want to fight with me. Im no fool its easy to see that you are favoring McCain/Palin ticket. Your tap dancing rhetoric isnt confusing me. Also I will find your post on the subjects you referenced.

Anger about what? I think your misstated assumptions are blinding you. As if you knew my state of mind or emotion when I responded to your post. Stick to the issues, not my emotional state. Or do you just wish to cast me as another angry person, is that a fall back tactic of yours?

I have been very consistent in debunking slander and smears, yes you are right about that. Perceived negative policies of Obama, I have given fair debates on that and intently listen to the other side of them as well. Once again another misstated assumption of yours.

This thread was a question of her judgment on governing with the association of this group. Nothing personal about her, neither do I fear such a person.

 

I think it is, we disagree, enough said. Also the fact that she attended conventions with him says alot to me.

 

what does obama's seeking the counsel and subsequent association with terrorist William Ayers say to you?

 

That is a shady association. But he never sought out the counsel of this guy. You have to present facts first.

What does Palin and her husband association in the AIP party says to you?

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/obamas_ayers_ties_are_relevant.html

 

I said facts and could you answer my question please?

 

the facts regarding obama's association with ayers are well known and spelled out in the article by michael barone. maybe you should spend a couple of minutes reading it before dismissing it. insofar as her association with the AIP, wasn't cbs news and others forced to retract over their assertion that she was/had been a member?

 

maybe you should take your own advice and research it a bit more. Her husband was a member for 7 years and she was in attendance during many of their conventions. But i understand your point its to bad you wont try to understand mine. I even called it a shady association.