She told her story user oath to the world already. And if the fbi treated her like every other witness Her lawyer would be telling the world how mean they were to her.
Kavanaugh also testified under oath. It's an investigation and the FBI should be talking to her to determine whether she lied. That would mean she broke several laws. I know I'm stating the obvious but really, she set the terms as to how she would be willing to testify and now she gets off without her background even being considered. It's appalling. All the FBI needed to do was even consider that 2nd door she had placed in her home. "Palo Alto city records show that a building permit for an additional room and exterior door was issued to Ford and her husband on Feb. 4, 2008 — more than four years before the May 2012 therapy session where, she says, she first identified Kavanaugh as her attacker…" In her opening statement, she claimed she had the door installed because she was traumatized by the alleged encounter with Kavanaugh. But that door was installed 4 years prior to her therapist sessions which is supposedly the first time her husband knew that anything had happened. Come on. We're supposed to believe that she was traumatized to the point of needing a 2nd front door but didn't tell her husband why for another 4 years? WTF? "Other documents, including health care-provider registration records, reveal that a marriage counselor listed Ford’s home address as her place of employment, ostensibly using the extra room and door for her clinical practice. That marriage therapist, Sylvia Adkins Randall, sold the home to the Fords in 2007, but continued to maintain the address for her business." So now the marriage therapist sold the home in 2007 prior to the door being installed in 2008 but was using the 2nd door for her clinical practice? She now says she doesn't want the nature of the real estate transaction or business dealings to be made public. Why is that? "Since the second front door was installed, moreover, students from local colleges have lived in the additional room with the private door. In fact, under congressional questioning Thursday, Ford testified she has “hosted” various other residents there, including “Google interns.”' Wait, wait, wait....hold up. We are supposed to believe that a woman who has allegedly been traumatized for 30 years, is comfortable with local college students living in the additional room as long as they use the 2nd door? And she was comfortable enough to host Google interns? Holy crap, this bitch is a liar like we've rarely seen. Google interns are more likely government variety spooks.
" an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, seemingly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination. The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor said she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford helping a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office. He also claimed Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a small, 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. due to a fear of flying, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door. Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote." Let's hope the FBI talked to this dude.
There have been others, J law, Scarlett Johansson, Shania Twain back in the day. They all took advantage of me. Figured it's time to out them.
This is one thing that strikes me odd. The republicans on the committee didn't even go after her testimony like I would have. I would have asked her as a 15 year old girl you were drinking beer at a house you cant even remember and don't know how you got there and how you got home. Are you sure it wasn't you who was inebriated. Maybe she was a belligerent drunk. The more I see things like you are saying she played the victim just perfect and not sure she even was one.
her credibility is highly questionable as it appears she has lied under oath. She literally played studid most of the hearing.