What was the common denominator in both of those games?


And no, it's not CLM

Without defense for the first 59 minutes, this wouldn't have been a game. Hard to be too critical of third and Chavis this week.

Then how about 1st and Chavis. That makes 2 in a row in our house with a late lead and the D scheme pisses it away. This isn't on the players they can only do what they are told to do.

If it worked for 59 min then why in the blue hell do you change it when it matters most.

Look forward to seeing you back soon Salle.

I just know that with the right QB and scheme along with utilization of talent, this team could be a very special one. And it seems to be that way year end and year out, however there are common denominators that keep the full potential from being realized. It's frustrating to say the least for me to witness.

Yep. With anything that resembles a passing game we'd have won by 2 td

We played them twice in the year 2012. First in the 2011 NCG and then 2012 regular season. That's what I think he was referring to.

I understand Cam Cameron and Les Miles are football guys but I'll never understand why we run a pro style offense with a dual threat qb. We had one great year at qb (last year) and it was with one of the few drop back qb's we've had.

I hoped LSU would be better passing than they have been this year. Falling short of hope is far less defeating than falling short of expectation. I expect them to be much better next year. That is not a low, or minor, or weak, or loose expectation. If they don't, then I will do everything in my (no) power to affect change. That means I will be relentless on this message board.

He'll be back. He's going to smoke a couple fatties and fade off into bolivia for a while.

Quite the contrary. The LSU D was dominating the Bama O until the final drive and OT. Chavis should have kept doing what was working. Not that stupid prevent D that has backfired for quite a few losses the last few years. So yes, Chavis deserves some blame.