they didnt lie, they are not qualified to determine cause of death. they also didnt deny she had the booster recently eh? just said it wasnt 3 days ago eh?
I never said it wasn’t data. You are saying one set of data is better than the other when in reality they are equal. Provable facts are the only reality. Both of us are speculating.
make no mistake Winston....if you rapped her it would be a crime. LOL....you don't have to sing or dance to rap, my friend! I'm trying to think of what a good rapper name would be for you.
it doesnt matter. dont worry about what people claim. they are probably kooky anti vaxxers. the fact is that the human body is very hard to understand, with a lot of chaotic interactions and feedbacks and shit. so anytime somebody claims medication X had side effect Y, i dont rule it out. i know a girl that will die if she eats peanuts. why? i dont know, i am not an immunologist or allergist or whatever. but thats how the human body works. its unpredictable.
No, you said "some people claim..." I want you to tell me who it was. Here are your words. you used this to draw a conclusion. the least you can do is tell me who they are. surely you know or you wouldn't have included it, right? so let's hear it.
it doesnt matter! lets say it was nobody, or my dog! or me. who cares! it doesnt matter what anyone claimed, my argument is that you cant rule out the vaccine having negative side effects that hurt BW. i certainly didnt and explained 100 times i was basing my contention it was likely she had the vaccine on the data, the stats. now what are you basing your contention that the vax did not hurt her? if you disagree that people claimed she was vaxxed, good for you, thats irrelevant. but they did, that is indisputable and irrelevant. the issue is whether its true, not who claimed it, or even if it was claimed at all.
