A new, scummy, insidious Bush Administration tactic emerges...

saltyone · May 6, 2005

Rex, what kind of mindless nonsense forum are you playing on over there?

Below is an example of Rex's friends at the other forum.

The language is GOOD for us.

The majority of the U.S. is not even Christian. If they want to divide people into two groups based on Christianity, let them.

On top of that, the world grows more and more secular each day. In my own family tree for instance, the offspring are evolving away faith:

My great-grandparents - devoutly religious people who probably didn't use birth control because of the Catholic Church's stance. Had a ton of kids.

Grandparents - Still very religious. Rarely missed a Catholic mass. Nobody can remember my grandfather ever uttering a single swear word. He was an extremely kind and warm man who I dearly miss.

My Parents/Uncles/Aunts - This group is mostly split. Some (like my parents) still consider Catholicism a large part of their lives, but others have doubts. One uncle became a Jehovah Witness. Others have just stopped going to church completely. One aunt had two abortions

Click to expand...

saltyone · May 6, 2005

Because their strategy is
world domination, and this is merely one more step of many more to come. They keep their eye on the ball (ultimate world power), and part of the plan is to raise these kind of issues precicely because they know this will keep us busy fighting for smaller goalpoasts while they are working on the bigger evils in the background - three steps ahead of us or more. Public opinion is no longer the issue, as they already know they have the power to quell any real threats, so it's in their interest to "keep the discussion going" as long as possible to keep us from realizing what they're REALLY doing.

9/11 was part one
Afghanistan was part two
Iraq was part three
Religious distraction part four?
Iran part five? Wanna imagine what comes next?

"It does not take many words to tell the truth." Chief Joseph

Click to expand...

This is getting good, I thought "Right Wing Christians" were supposed to be the conspiracy theorist. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Sourdoughman · May 7, 2005

Rex said:

Christian? Good god, no... I'm the world's staunchest atheist.
Click to expand...

You said it I didn't, that is the worlds "other" faith.
I would bet more democrats in this country are atheist, scientologists and
new religions like that than christian or catholic.
I don't see how any Christian could vote Democrat since their principles are so
different?

I would bet that there are more atheist who vote Democrat, Liberals out there because it fits with there life style.
I'm not saying its so, maybe I could be wrong?
Just a little common sense tells you how different the life styles are.
Pro-Abortion=Pro-Choice

In light of things revealed I see nothing wrong with what anyone else says
about the other side having a different faith.
Sorry Rex, another thread from you with much to do about nothing! :redface: :shock: :dis: :lol:

G_MAN113 · May 7, 2005

Rex said:

These are canned, pre-scripted meetings, and not true "town hall meetings" at all, so it's a fair bet that Cheney/Rove were complicit in the wording of the questions.
Click to expand...

Yeah, gee, the Clintons never did anything like that, now, did they? All of their "town hall" meetings were purely off-the-cuff and unscripted.

And if you really believe that, I also have some lovely beachfront property
in Iowa that I'm willing to let go cheap.

G_MAN113 · May 7, 2005

Rex said:

It looks like the rightwingers are wanting to start a meme of calling Democrats people OF THE OTHER FAITH. You know, as opposed to the good Christian faith of the Republicans.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/4/155225/5465
Click to expand...

I must admit it may have been a poor choice of words on VP Cheney's part...if only because it gives leftist zealots like you a shred of something to hang your hats on.

SabanFan · May 7, 2005

Rex said:

Christian? Good god, no... I'm the world's staunchest atheist.
Click to expand...

What you should have said was Christian? Good madelyn murray o'hair, no.

Or Good lesbian c*nt, no (same thing).

martin · May 7, 2005

saltyone said:

when he says "other faith", he's not refering to religious faith. He is stating that the other side (Democrats) believe in a different way than he does on this issue. And by the way, there are also some republicans of the "other faith", meaning that they don't support the changes that are suggested.
Click to expand...

this is clearly correct. like i said, its like jokingly referring to fans of the other team as "of another faith". he means people who do not have faith in their plans or point of view.

you have to really really want him to be saying something you dont like to construe it the way rex has. rex is going out of his way to find something that somebody somewhere might find offensive. that is what liberals do.

red55 · May 8, 2005

saltyone said:

And just so you know, when he says "other faith", he's not refering to religious faith. He is stating that the other side (Democrats) believe in a different way than he does on this issue. And by the way, there are also some republicans of the "other faith", meaning that they don't support the changes that are suggested.
Click to expand...

I've got to agree with Salty on this one. Dubya has a habit of not speaking clearly and a tendency to use odd phrases.

Check this George W. Bush quote on Social Security( Tampa 2/04/05).

"Because the -- All which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, How benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases.

"There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be -- or closer delivered to what has been promised."

"Look, there's a series of things that cause the -- Like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested we calculate -- the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases."

"There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those -- If that growth is affected it will help on the red."

Got that?

Contained Chaos · May 9, 2005

my favorite is...

'Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.'

oh, reeeeally now? :hihi: :hihi: :hihi:

Log in or Sign up

A new, scummy, insidious Bush Administration tactic emerges...

saltyone So Mote It Be

saltyone So Mote It Be

Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

G_MAN113 Founding Member

G_MAN113 Founding Member

SabanFan The voice of reason

martin Banned Forever

red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

Contained Chaos Don't we all?

Share This Page