A recession is due to a consumers spending less money. The reasons behind consumers slowing (or increasing) spending are psychological.
When you said "public works", I took that to mean uncontracted - government managed labor. Just a misunderstanding.
It ain't that simple. Consumer confidence may have a psycological element, but there are many other factors at work to make a recession--GDP growth, real personal income, employment, trade balance, dollar strength, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. The 1981 recession is thought to have been caused by the tight-money policy adopted by Paul Volcker. The current one was brought on by irrational exhuberence by buyers and sellers of mortagages . . . not by consumers spending less, but by them borrowing more.
You're talking in circles, Red. On the one hand, you're saying that the current recession was brought on by "irrational exhuberence" (which I think is correct) and on the other had you're saying the psychological element isn't paramount. Economics is ALL psychological in a capitalist democracy. The stock market is one huge emotion mill.
The two are not mutually exclusive. I'd like to see you prove it. Economics is far more complex than that, especially in the international economy that we live in. You are confused, sir. The stock market and the national economy are two very different things.
Consumer confidence may have a psychological element? Confidence is a psychologic feature by its very nature. I'm not saying that real factors don't affect consumer confidence, but ultimately consumer confidence is what defines a recession. GDP growth, income, and employment are all determined by confidence.
The value of money is now totally abstract, so the entire system is built out of dreams, trust, and hot air.
I am, of course, going to have to disagree. GDP growth is primarily driven by consumer spending, while employment & income are driven by expected GDP growth (on a micro-level). It's all based around perception. If people perceive the economy being bad, they stop spending. If businesses perceive a slow down in spending, they lay off employees and slow pay-growth. The reverse is also true. During a boom, when everybody is happy about the economy - people spend more, and businesses hire and pay more.