2011 Rivals Rankings Thread

Discussion in 'LSU RECRUITING' started by bhelmLSU, Jun 1, 2010.

  1. tigerfan1974

    tigerfan1974 Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    10
    Impressive-Late hits on kids half his size, several holding penalties.
    I like OLinemen mean and nasty too, but this kid goes overboard IMO.
     
  2. deuce985

    deuce985 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    25
    Their rankings are really messed up right now. None of this is close to final. Lots of players aren't where they should be and I expect some of our 5 stars to fall once they evaluate other players properly. Randle not in the 250 is a big joke, IMO. I do not know what Rivals problem is with Hill but they're obviously not high on him at all, they didn't even put him in the top 250.
     
  3. LSU-SIU

    LSU-SIU Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    52
    Yeah the spring game was kind of laughable. I wouldn't mind ONE guy in there mixing it up.
     
  4. bmy-

    bmy- Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,128
    Likes Received:
    103
    Rivals guy said that Randle had 'ok' measurements when they evaluated him at camp and that he looked a little stiff.
     
  5. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    Only 27 prospects outside of the 250 got 4 stars up to this point.

    Jeremy Hill was one of them.
     
  6. deuce985

    deuce985 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    25
    Yea, typical Rivals being hypocrites. They weren't impressed by his measurables either, so why is Landry/Hilliard ranked so high then? Because its definitely not measurables. Randle has impressive film, hes a Football player, I do not see the problem...
     
  7. stevescookin

    stevescookin Certified Who Dat

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10,218
    Likes Received:
    3,033
    "Because he didn't commit to Bama"....in 5....4...3...2....:grin:.
     
  8. bmy-

    bmy- Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,128
    Likes Received:
    103
    I agree he definitely has impressive film. Hilliard is ranked so high based on production I think. Landry.. well.. he just demands respect. Trevon Randle flys to the ball but he does seem like a bit of a tweener right now. Perfect for a Chavis LB, but that may be why he's slipped down the rankings.

    He's a 250 guy though, for sure. If he's not.. well, hype or not I'm glad he's going to be in P&G.
     
  9. deuce985

    deuce985 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    25
    That is the point I'm trying to make. Hilliard and Landry look amazing on film, so they get the respect they deserve. They are Football players. Randle should be getting that respect too, just by his film. He hits like a truck and I'll be damned if he isn't fast on film...he gets sideline to sideline fast. I think Rivals puts way too much stock in their combines. Running around in shorts doesn't prove you're a good Football player...
     
  10. bmy-

    bmy- Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,128
    Likes Received:
    103
    Maclin last year and Randle this year.. those 'stiff' LBs will make us happy I hope. If Maclin doesn't move to DE at least.
     

Share This Page