2003 NYT article shows Bush tried to regulate the lenders, Dems shot it down

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUDeek, Sep 18, 2008.

  1. LSUDeek

    LSUDeek All That She Wants...

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    6,456
    Likes Received:
    151
  2. TigerKid05

    TigerKid05 Say Whaa!?!?

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,944
    Likes Received:
    199
    regardless, the gov't should have to regulate this. this whole mess came about with people buying more than they could afford and it shot them in the foot. the housing market was a bubble and it just burst and now the taxpayers have to deal with it
     
  3. TheDude

    TheDude I'm calmer than you.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,439
    Likes Received:
    717
    A $400 million fine and you say there is no evidence? Why didn't they just blow off the fine, since there is no evidence of wrongdoing? That is a load of crap.There is plenty of evidence of wrongdoing, but congress wanted no action because they are up to their eyeballs in this and that is the only reason people are not going to jail.

    It can be listed as an oversight in order to qualify it as a civil matter but to assume that the fraudulent accounting was unintentional is totally moronic. Luckily the majority of Americans fall into this category.
     
  4. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    Can I have a glass.
     
  5. TheDude

    TheDude I'm calmer than you.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,439
    Likes Received:
    717
    Sure! What's one 27th of a dollar among friends??
     

Share This Page