Don't get me wrong, I know why this forum hates that kind of thing, we've lost a lot of games where a lot had to go right for our opponents to stand a chance, but that doesn't mean it's not strategically sound. Especially in this game where UCF was playing horribly until after that 3 and out. And for the record, I'm definitely in favor of replacing E and probably O too. I'm just saying that this game isn't as bad as it looks. UCF isn't good, but we did dominate them despite the scoreboard.
You're quickly becoming to be in the same boat as him in my book, as far as being taken seriously. Not sure what in the heck has gotten into you lately.
Yes. I saw a graphic this week saying that. Don’t recall where. There are multiple ways to measure it, but I saw a graphic saying we were numero uno.
I didn’t think E called a terrible game, we moved the ball when we needed to. Execution was hindered by stupid penalties but for the most part I didn’t hate the way we played offensively. There were some lulls but guys stepped up when needed. On Defense it is the best we could do, I mean we had wide outs playing in the secondary. As far as the refs....the suck A$$!
Agree, but we could’ve been more forthright at the end to put the game away. I think the criticisms about our RZ offense are warranted, and I know you feel that way too. We had enough mistakes at key moments to cover 2 games, otherwise this game is a blow out on the scoreboard and not just in the stats.
