the word extreme only means something relative to something else. i feel like the definitions are skewed by whatever current state we are in...
i suppose. and i apologize for that bit of rudeness. but again, i feel like what is considered extreme is arbitrary, and defined by the whims of...
i least i dont straddle the lines, always refusing to have a principle, for fear of losing the moral high ground to either side.
independent of both of you being self-righteous, this question has an answer. republicans are better because they at least in principle favor...
headline should read "sleazy attorney seeks notoriety"
oops
electrolytes, water, caffeine, ibuprofen.
lasalle only approves of one activity, hunting. message board browsing, shooting pigs from a chopper, both these things are not proper hunting...
what do you care if an activity can be described as "hunting" or not? because almost everything i do can be described as "not hunting".
