While the 12 lsu d was great, I still have to think the 85 bears were slightly better.
I eliminated au and uf
Bullshit on this one.
Couldn't watch but how do they lose that one. 40 to 35 reb 14 to 6 o reb Even turnovers Equal fg made 3 more 3 ptrs. Must be the 4 ffing fts...
theyll be great. it has been a while though since lsu hasnt had 8 DL to rotate.
i know its obvious, but people keep saying "5 star" this and "3 star" that.
ok, so what the hell were you talking about?
they will be of the traditional top half (UA, AU, UF, UGA, LSU), swap USC for UT, and add TAMU. they will have a returning qb. (same list as...
that D wont be able to hold an O to under 30 pts for 100 plays. get ready for more blitzing. unless the OL can just grate everyone.
less
they've both shown they will leave a top program.
i thought a master's was a negative because you spent a couple years for something worth nothing.
so im assuming this guy ranks on how good the team will be not on how good the season will be. lsu plays 3 of his top 10 plus uf and tcu.
maybe clm will bring in tyke tolbert and keep the porn stache thing going.
the only way i cant judge player development is on the field. the recruiting rankings seem to be greatly flawed. but since most of us dont see...
help with what? i thought it wasnt addictive.
it doesnt feel like a dynasty.
lee last year had a QB rating of 152. was there a point?
rename lsu "nick saban university" and he'd come back.
if you are arguing about head coaches, you cannot separate recruiting from coaching. for those of you that have forgotten. clm: hired chavis...
